Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010).

Jonathan Smallwood

Psychological Bulletin March 1, 2010 DOI: 10.1037/a0018673 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

When the mind wanders, conscious thoughts arise that are only loosely related to the current task, creating tension in cognitive science because such interfering thoughts seem at odds with the assumption that they serve functional purposes. The control-failure hypothesis suggests that lapses in executive control create conditions favoring mind wandering, questioning whether it consumes resources. However, mind wandering is always a conscious, reportable experience, indicating it is globally available to the system and therefore demands resources—specifically access to a global workspace that supports conscious experience.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Competition biology Resource disambiguation Psychology Business Computer science
Citations 173
Key finding Argues that mind wandering is resource demanding because it occupies the global workspace necessary for consciousness, making default mode information globally available.

Abstract

When the mind wanders, conscious thoughts come to mind that are only loosely related to the task being performed. This phenomenon produces tension within the cognitive sciences because the interfering nature of these thoughts is at odds with the assumption that such processes are functional in daily life. In their comment, McVay and Kane (2010) suggested that failures in executive control can create the conditions that favor mind wandering—a control-failure hypothesis that questions whether mind wandering consumes resources. Whether mind wandering always occurs following a control failure, it is always a conscious reportable experience and so is globally available to the system. Such global availability suggests that mind wandering does indeed demand resources, in particular access to a global workspace that supports conscious experience. Although the control-failure view explains the transient occurrence of mind wandering during demanding tasks, the global availability hypothesis is consistent with all mind wandering, regardless of context; it is implied by many features of the argument proposed by McVay and Kane (2010). Consideration of these issues leads to the conclusion that when the mind wanders, specific information from the default mode becomes globally available to the system; in this respect, mind wandering is resource demanding inasmuch as it occupies the global workspace necessary for consciousness.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment