Skip to content

The Activation-Synthesis Theory of Dreaming

G. William Domhoff

Oxford Scholarship Online September 21, 2017 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190673420.003.0007 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Dreaming
Key points Argues that all empirical claims of activation-synthesis theory made in 1977 were refuted by the mid-1980s, with additional disconfirming evidence from methodological and technical advances in the 2000s, and that the theory's dream-content studies have major flaws contradicted by earlier findings.

Abstract

This chapter provides the most detailed critical analysis yet developed of the neurophysiological theory of dreaming called activation-synthesis theory, a bottom-up theory that rejects a top-down neurocognitive approach because rigorous studies of dream content allegedly cannot be carried out, especially on the basis of dream reports collected in the sleep lab. This theory suggests that dreams may be “cognitive trash.” The chapter draws on detailed neurophysiological evidence little known outside of neurophysiology, and hardly at all among dream researchers, to show that all of the empirical claims put forth by activation-synthesis theorists in 1977 had been shown to be wrong by the mid-1980s, with further evidence for this refutation appearing in the 2000s due to methodological and technical advances. Similarly, the studies of dream content by activation-synthesis theorists have major flaws and are contradicted by most of the findings presented in earlier chapters.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on dreaming, most cited first.

Explore topics