Skip to content

Isolated Sleep Paralysis: Fear, Prevention, and Disruption.

Brian Andrew Sharpless, Jessica Lynn Grom

Behavioral Sleep Medicine 2016 DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2014.963583 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Clinical interview study Peer reviewed
Sample size 156
Population Undergraduates assessed for lifetime isolated sleep paralysis
Key points Among 156 undergraduates, 75.64% of those with isolated sleep paralysis experienced fear during episodes and 15.38% reported clinically significant distress or interference. Prevention attempts were made by 19.23%, with 79.31% of those believing their methods succeeded; 69.29% attempted disruption, but only 54.12% reported it effective. The authors propose that encouraging these techniques and better symptom monitoring may help manage problematic ISP.

Abstract

Relatively little is known about isolated sleep paralysis (ISP), and no empirically supported treatments are available. This study aims to determine: the clinical impact of ISP, the techniques used to prevent or disrupt ISP, and the effectiveness of these techniques. 156 undergraduates were assessed with lifetime ISP using a clinical interview. 75.64% experienced fear during ISP, and 15.38% experienced clinically significant distress/interference, while 19.23% attempted to prevent ISP, and 79.31% of these believed their methods were successful. Regarding disruption, 69.29% made attempts, but only 54.12% reported them effective. Disruption was more common than prevention, but several techniques were useful. Encouraging individuals to utilize these techniques and better monitor their symptoms may be an effective way to manage problematic ISP.

Citations in the library