Skip to content

Insomnia—perchance a dream? Results from a NREM/REM sleep awakening study in good sleepers and patients with insomnia

Bernd Feige, Svetoslava Nanovska, Chiara Baglioni, Benedict Bier, Laura Cabrera, Sarah Diemers, Maximilian Quellmalz, Markus Siegel, Ireni Xeni, András Szentkirályi, John Peter Doerr, Dieter Wilhelm Riemann

Sleep February 8, 2018 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsy032 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Case-control study Peer reviewed
Sample size 54
Population 27 patients with insomnia disorder and 27 age- and gender-matched good sleeper controls
Duration Four consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory
Citations 83
Key findings Auditory awakening thresholds did not differ between patients with insomnia and good sleeper controls, but thresholds decreased over the course of the night. Patients with insomnia more often reported being awake when woken from REM sleep, though not from N2, were less certain when indicating they had been asleep, and rated their REM sleep mentation as more emotionally negative. The authors propose that the subjective experience of insomnia may be specifically coupled to the REM sleep state, possibly reflecting a hybrid sleep state.

Abstract

Study

Objectives: Insomnia disorder (ID) is a frequent sleep disorder coupled with increased risks for somatic and mental illness. Although subjective complaints are severe, polysomnography (PSG) parameters show only modest differences between groups. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep as the most aroused sleep state may be especially vulnerable to be perceived as wake. To directly assess possible differences, we determined auditory waking thresholds and sleep perception in patients with ID and healthy control participants (good sleeper controls [GSC]) in N2 and REM sleep.

Methods: In case-control study, 27 patients with ID and 27 age- and gender-matched controls were included. Four consecutive nights were assessed in the sleep laboratory, with nights 3 and 4 each containing three awakenings either from stable N2 or REM sleep. Awakening thresholds in patients with ID did not differ from GSC, but decreased over the course of the night. Patients with ID indicated significantly more frequently than GSC having been awake when woken from REM sleep but not from N2 and were less sure when indicating they had been asleep. Additionally, participants with ID rated their REM sleep mentation as more emotionally negative compared with GSC.

Conclusions: This study presents direct evidence that the subjective experience of insomnia might be specifically coupled to the REM sleep state. Assuming chronic hyperarousal as a central pathophysiologically relevant pathway for insomnia, this might become especially evident during REM sleep, thus reflecting a hybrid sleep state in insomnia being coupled with altered sleep perception.

Citations in the library

Explore topics