Skip to content

The brain's center of gravity: how the default mode network helps us to understand the self

Christopher G. Davey, Ben J. Harrison

World Psychiatry September 7, 2018 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20553 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Default mode network
Citations 60
Key points Argues that the self, though intuitively grasped, defies simple definition, and that it can be broadly divided into an experiencing self and an extended self that is perceived as an object. Notes that comparable distinctions appear in William James's "I" and "me," Damasio's core and autobiographical self, and Gallagher's minimal and narrative self.

Abstract

The self is an elusive concept. We have an intuitive sense as to what it refers to, but it defies simple definition. There is some consensus that the self can be broadly separated into what W. James referred to as the "I" and the "me" – the self that experiences, and the self that extends outwards in space and in time, allowing it to be perceived as an object1. This includes the self as physical object (the body), and as an abstract object with beliefs and attitudes. Divisions of the self similar to James's have been suggested by Damasio (the core and the autobiographical self)2 and Gallagher (the minimal and the narrative self)3.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on default mode network, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics