Skip to content

Prevalence of Mindfulness Practices in the US Workforce: National Health Interview Survey

Diana Kachan, Henry A. Olano, Stacey L. Tannenbaum, Debra W. Annane, Ashwin B. Mehta, Kristopher L. Arheart, Lora E. Fleming, Xuan Yang, Laura A. McClure, David J. Lee

Preventing Chronic Disease December 30, 2016 DOI: 10.5888/pcd14.160034 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study using repeated cross-sectional national survey data Peer reviewed
Sample size 85,004
Population US adults aged 18 years and older who were workers, surveyed in 2002, 2007, and 2012
Topics Meditation
Citations 59
Key findings Reported yoga practice among US workers nearly doubled from 6.0% in 2002 to 11.0% in 2012, and meditation increased from 8.0% in 2002 to 9.9% in 2007. Mindfulness practice was less common among farm workers (odds ratio 0.42) and blue-collar workers (odds ratio 0.63) than among white-collar workers.

Abstract

Introduction: Mindfulness-based practices can improve workers' health and reduce employers' costs by ameliorating the negative effect of stress on workers' health. We examined the prevalence of engagement in 4 mindfulness-based practices in the US workforce.

Methods: We used 2002, 2007, and 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data for adults (aged ≥18 y, n = 85,004) to examine 12-month engagement in meditation, yoga, tai chi, and qigong among different groups of workers.

Results: Reported yoga practice prevalence nearly doubled from 6.0% in 2002 to 11.0% in 2012 (P < .001); meditation rates increased from 8.0% in 2002 to 9.9% in 2007 (P < .001). In multivariable models, mindfulness practice was significantly lower among farm workers (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.83]) and blue-collar workers (OR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.74) than among white-collar workers.

Conclusion: Worker groups with low rates of engagement in mindfulness practices could most benefit from workplace mindfulness interventions. Improving institutional factors limiting access to mindfulness-based wellness programs and addressing existing beliefs about mindfulness practices among underrepresented worker groups could help eliminate barriers to these programs.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics