Skip to content

PHIT for Duty, a Mobile Application for Stress Reduction, Sleep Improvement, and Alcohol Moderation.

Paul N Kizakevich, Randall Eckhoff, Janice Brown, Stephen J Tueller, Belinda Weimer, Stacey Bell, Adam Weeks, Laurel L Hourani, James L Spira, Laurel A King

Military Medicine March 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usx157 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Usability and health assessment study Peer reviewed
Sample size 31
Population Individuals in the armed forces with subclinical psychological problems
Intervention behavioral education in sleep quality and alcohol use
Measures System Usability Scale (SUS)
Key points Participants rated the PHIT for Duty app's overall usability at 4.5 out of 5, and the System Usability Scale score averaged 85 out of 100, ranking at the 95th percentile. App-based assessments correlated strongly with traditional paper forms (r = 0.87). The authors report these results as positive affirmation for using the app in mobile health research.

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress and other problems often occur after combat, deployment, and other military operations. Because techniques such as mindfulness meditation show efficacy in improving mental health, our team developed a mobile application (app) for individuals in the armed forces with subclinical psychological problems as secondary prevention of more significant disease. Based on the Personal Health Intervention Toolkit (PHIT), a mobile app framework for personalized health intervention studies, PHIT for Duty integrates mindfulness-based relaxation, behavioral education in sleep quality and alcohol use, and psychometric and psychophysiological data capture. We evaluated PHIT for Duty in usability and health assessment studies to establish app quality for use in health research. Participants (N = 31) rated usability on a 1 (very hard) to 5 (very easy) scale and also completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire (N = 9). Results were (mean ± SD) overall (4.5 ± 0.6), self-report instruments (4.5 ± 0.7), pulse sensor (3.7 ± 1.2), sleep monitor (4.4 ± 0.7), sleep monitor comfort (3.7 ± 1.1), and wrist actigraphy comfort (2.7 ± 0.9). The average SUS score was 85 ± 12, indicating a rank of 95%. A comparison of PHIT-based assessments to traditional paper forms demonstrated a high overall correlation (r = 0.87). These evaluations of usability, health assessment accuracy, physiological sensing, system acceptability, and overall functionality have shown positive results and affirmation for using the PHIT framework and PHIT for Duty application in mobile health research.

Citations in the library

Explore topics