Skip to content

Assessment of Pathological Personality traits in Meditation Practitioners and Non-practitioners

Lucas de Francisco Carvalho, Wellington Arruda

Paidéia July 2, 2018 DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e2804 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-sectional comparative study Peer reviewed
Sample size 104
Population Adults over 18 years, including 53 concentrative and mindfulness meditation practitioners and 51 non-practitioners
Measures Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)
Topics Meditation
Citations 2
Key findings Non-practitioners showed higher mean scores on the personality dimensions and factors assessed, and specific pathological traits predicted group membership. The authors indicate that meditation practitioners tended to have lower intensity of pathological personality traits.

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate and compare pathological personality traits in meditation practitioners and non-practitioners. Therefore, data were collected from 104 participants of both sexes aged over 18 years, including 53 practitioners of concentrative and mindfulness meditation styles, and 51 non-practitioners. Participants responded to the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP), the Brazilian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), and an anamnesis questionnaire about the practice of meditation; we proceeded to repeated ANOVA measures and logistic regression analysis to verify the study’s goals. Overall, higher means were observed for non-practitioners in the dimensions/factors of the tests, and specific pathological traits as best predictors of the participating groups (practitioners versus non-practitioners). The results indicated that the meditators tended to have lower intensity of pathological personality traits.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics