Skip to content

Meditation and Metacontrol.

Bernhard Hommel, Lorenza S. Colzato

Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 2017 DOI: 10.1007/s41465-017-0017-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Interventions Focused-attention meditation Open-monitoring meditation
Topics Meditation
Keywords Cognitive control Decision making Flexibility Focused-attention meditation Open-monitoring meditation Persistence
Key points Argues that focused-attention meditation and open-monitoring meditation have different, to some degree opposite effects on cognitive control, with single bouts of FAM biasing control toward more top-down control and OMM toward less top-down control; concludes that meditation techniques are not equal and interventions should select techniques on theoretical grounds.

Abstract

In addition to longer-term engagement in meditation, the past years have seen an increasing interest in the impact of single bouts of meditation on cognition. In this hypothesis and theory article, we adopt the distinction between focused-attention meditation (FAM) and open-monitoring meditation (OMM) and argue that these different types of meditation have different, to some degree, opposite impact on cognitive processes. We discuss evidence suggesting that single bouts of FAM and OMM are sufficient to bias cognitive control styles towards more versus less top-down control, respectively. We conclude that all meditation techniques are not equal and that successful meditation-based intervention requires the theoretically guided selection of the best-suited technique.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Cited by 17

and 12 more in the library

Cites 6

and 1 more in the library

Explore topics