Skip to content

The importance of awareness for understanding language.

Hugh Rabagliati, Alexander Robertson, David Podhortzer Carmel

Journal of Experimental Psychology General January 25, 2018 DOI: 10.1037/xge0000348 (opens in new tab)

The journal has published a correction to this paper. Read the correction (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Series of replication and extension experiments with meta-analysis and computational simulations Peer reviewed
Citations 62
Key findings Across 10 high-powered studies, no evidence was found that the meaning of a phrase or word could be understood without awareness, though low-level perceptual features such as sentence length and alphabet familiarity were processed unconsciously. A meta-analysis corroborated the null findings, and simulations suggest prior positive results may stem from false positives caused by skewed, heavy-tailed CFS data under common exclusion criteria. The authors suggest consciousness may be required for high-level cognition such as language understanding.

Abstract

Is consciousness required for high level cognitive processes, or can the unconscious mind perform tasks that are as complex and difficult as, for example, understanding a sentence? Recent work has argued that, yes, the unconscious mind can: Sklar et al. (2012) found that sentences, masked from consciousness using the technique of continuous flash suppression (CFS), broke into awareness more rapidly when their meanings were more unusual or more emotionally negative, even though processing the sentences' meaning required unconsciously combining each word's meaning. This has motivated the important claim that consciousness plays little-to-no functional role in high-level cognitive operations. Here, we aimed to replicate and extend these findings, but instead, across 10 high-powered studies, we found no evidence that the meaning of a phrase or word could be understood without awareness. We did, however, consistently find evidence that low-level perceptual features, such as sentence length and familiarity of alphabet, could be processed unconsciously. Our null findings for sentence processing are corroborated by a meta-analysis that aggregates our studies with the prior literature. We offer a potential explanation for prior positive results through a set of computational simulations, which show how the distributional characteristics of this type of CFS data, in particular its skew and heavy tail, can cause an elevated level of false positive results when common data exclusion criteria are applied. Our findings thus have practical implication for analyzing such data. More importantly, they suggest that consciousness may well be required for high-level cognitive tasks such as understanding language. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citations in the library

Explore topics