Skip to content

The acute effects of cannabis on human executive function

P. Oomen, Hendrika H Van Hell, Matthijs G. Bossong

Behavioural Pharmacology September 7, 2018 DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000426 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Intervention Cannabis
Topics Cannabis
Key findings The authors conclude that acute cannabis or THC administration impairs inhibition, most strongly after pulmonary administration of higher THC doses, with neuroimaging evidence pointing to the inferior frontal gyrus as the main mediator. Working memory and reasoning/association are less clearly affected, possibly due to compensatory neural mechanisms. Variation in results may reflect task attentional demands, administration methods, and participants' cannabis use history.

Abstract

Cannabis remains the most frequently used illicit drug worldwide. It produces a broad range of acute effects, such as euphoria, increased heart rate and perceptual alterations. Over the last few decades, a substantial number of experiments have been conducted to provide insight into the acute effects of cannabis on cognition. Here, we systematically review studies that investigated the impact of administration of cannabis or [INCREMENT]9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive constituent of cannabis, on human executive function, in particular, on the three principal domains of inhibition, working memory and reasoning/association. Our findings suggest that cannabis use results in acute impairment of inhibition, with the strongest effects after pulmonary administration of higher doses of [INCREMENT]9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Results from neuroimaging studies indicate that these effects are predominantly modulated through neural processes in the inferior frontal gyrus. Working memory and reasoning/association are less clearly affected by cannabis administration, possibly because of compensational neural mechanisms to overcome the effects of cannabis intoxication on performance accuracy. Factors that may account for the variation in results are the extent to which a paradigm involves attentional processes, differences between studies in administration methods and variation in the patients’ history of cannabis use.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Effects of cannabis use on outcomes of psychotic disorders: systematic review People with psychotic disorders, as examined in 13 longitudinal studies 2008 Systematic review
The Impact of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Existing Findings and New Data in a First-Episode Sample Patients with established schizophrenia (meta-analysis: 572) and patients with... 2010 Meta-analysis and cross-sectional observational study n = 700
Medicinal cannabis for psychiatric disorders: a clinically-focused systematic review 2020 Systematic review
Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review of the literature Cannabis users and controls in neuroimaging studies 2009 Systematic review
Human Laboratory Studies on Cannabinoids and Psychosis. Healthy human subjects and individuals with schizophrenia 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics