Skip to content

Mystical orientation, mystical experience, and mysticism : psychological perspectives

Leslie J. Francis

Warwick Research Archive Portal November 1, 2013 DOI: 10.6720/scr.201311_(2).0003 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Survey-based scale construction and individual-differences analysis, with literature review Peer reviewed
Population Respondents to the Religious Experience in Contemporary Taiwan survey
Measures Hood Mysticism Scale, Francis-Louden Mystical Orientation Scale, Index of Mystical Experience in Taiwan (IMET)
Topics Mystical experience Mysticism
Key findings The paper reviews psychological research on mysticism, highlighting Stace's conceptualization operationalized by the Hood Mysticism Scale and Happold's conceptualization operationalized by the Francis-Louden Mystical Orientation Scale. It then constructs the Index of Mystical Experience in Taiwan (IMET) from Religious Experience in Contemporary Taiwan survey data and uses it to examine connections between mystical experience and sex, age, education, religious identity, and religious belief. No specific results are reported in the abstract.

Abstract

Since the pioneering work of William James at the dawn of the twentieth century, psychologists have been interested in the study of mysticism, with the consequence that mysticism is now the aspect of religious experience most adequately and most comprehensively discussed within the psychology of religion. The aims of this paper are threefold. First, attention is given to the detailed international research literature on the psychology of the three constructs identified as mystical orientation, mystical experience, and mysticism. Emphasis is placed 1) on the conceptualisation of Stace and the operationalisation afforded by the Hood Mysticism Scale, and 2) on the conceptualisation of Happold and the operationalisation afforded by the Francis-Louden Mystical Orientation Scale. Second, the new data concerning mysticism from the Religious Experience in Contemporary Taiwan survey are employed to construct the Index of Mystical Experience in Taiwan (IMET). Third, this new instrument is employed to examine the connections between mystical experience and individual differences of sex, age, education, religious identity and religious belief.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on mystical experience, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Of Roots and Fruits: A Comparison of Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic Mystical Experiences Self-selected participants who reported a religious, spiritual, or mystical experience 2016 Cross-sectional survey n = 739
Illicit Use of LSD or Psilocybin, but not MDMA or Nonpsychedelic Drugs, is Associated with Mystical Experiences in a Dose-Dependent Manner Adults recruited from the MAPS website and newsletter, most reporting use of various... 2012 Cross-sectional survey n = 337
Peak Experiences: Some Empirical Tests Random sample of adults in the San Francisco Bay Area 1978 Cross-sectional survey
Peak Experience Tendencies 1982 Cross-sectional survey
Rhythmic Chanting and Mystical States across Traditions. Regular chanters across 33 countries 2021 Cross-sectional survey n = 464

Explore topics