Skip to content

Prospective study of cannabis use in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis: impact on conversion to psychosis and functional outcome

Andrea M. Auther, Danielle McLaughlin, Ricardo E Carrión, P. Nagachandran, C. U. Correll, Barbara Cornblatt

Psychological Medicine December 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291712000803 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 160
Population Clinical high-risk subjects with attenuated positive symptoms of psychosis (n=101, age 12–22) and healthy controls (n=59)
Duration Average 2.97 years follow-up
Measures Global Functioning: Social (GF:Social)
Topics Cannabis
Key findings Among clinical high-risk youth, lifetime cannabis users had higher social functioning and less social anhedonia than non-users at baseline and follow-up, and conversion to psychosis was not related to lifetime cannabis use or abuse. The authors conclude that low to moderate lifetime cannabis use is not a major contributor to psychosis or poor social and role functioning in this population.

Abstract

Background: Clinical and epidemiological studies suggest an association between cannabis use and psychosis but this relationship remains controversial.

Method: Clinical high-risk (CHR) subjects (age 12–22 years) with attenuated positive symptoms of psychosis (CHR+,n=101) were compared to healthy controls (HC,n=59) on rates of substance use, including cannabis. CHR+ subjects with and without lifetime cannabis use (and abuse) were compared on prodromal symptoms and social/role functioning at baseline. Participants were followed an average of 2.97 years to determine psychosis conversion status and functional outcome.

Results: At baseline, CHR+ subjects had significantly higher rates of lifetime cannabis use than HC. CHR+ lifetime cannabis users (n=35) were older (p=0.015, trend), more likely to be Caucasian (p=0.002), less socially anhedonic (p<0.001) and had higher Global Functioning: Social (GF:Social) scores (p<0.001) than non-users (n=61). CHR+ cannabis users continued to have higher social functioning than non-users at follow-up (p<0.001) but showed no differences in role functioning. A small sample of CHR+ cannabis abusers (n=10) showed similar results in that abusers were older (p=0.008), less socially anhedonic (p=0.017, trend) and had higher baseline GF:Social scores (p=0.006) than non-abusers. Logistic regression analyses revealed that conversion to psychosis in CHR+ subjects (n=15) was not related to lifetime cannabis use or abuse.

Conclusions: The current data do not indicate that low to moderate lifetime cannabis use is a major contributor to psychosis or poor social and role functioning in clinical high-risk youth with attenuated positive symptoms of psychosis.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis People with first episode of psychosis and healthy controls from the local population 2009 Case-control study n = 454
Ayahuasca-Assisted Therapy for Addiction: Results from a Preliminary Observational Study in Canada Rural aboriginal population 2013 Observational study
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
Continued cannabis use and risk of incidence and persistence of psychotic symptoms: 10 year follow-up cohort study Individuals from the general population in Germany aged 14-24 at baseline 2011 Observational cohort n = 1,923
Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: follow-up study of 535 incident cases Patients treated for cannabis-induced psychotic symptoms in Denmark between 1994 and... 2005 Observational cohort n = 535

Citations in the library

Cited by 14

and 9 more in the library

Cites 10

and 5 more in the library

Explore topics