Skip to content

Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Phytocannabinoids, Endocannabinoids, and Synthetic Cannabinoids.

Jenny L Wiley, R Allen Owens, Aron H Lichtman

Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2018 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2016_24 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords 2-arachidonoylglycerol Anandamide Endocannabinoids Faah inhibitors Magl inhibitors Synthetic cannabinoids δ9-THC
Key findings The review concludes that cannabinoids from plants, the body, and laboratories produce their discriminative stimulus effects mainly through CB1 receptor stimulation, and that endogenous increases in both anandamide and 2-AG seem optimal for mimicking THC's discriminative effects. It argues that cannabinoid discrimination remains the most validated animal model of marijuana's subjective effects and is useful for predicting the abuse liability of synthetic cannabinoids.

Abstract

Psychoactive cannabinoids from the marijuana plant (phytocannabinoids), from the body (endocannabinoids), and from the research lab (synthetic cannabinoids) produce their discriminative stimulus effects by stimulation of CB1 receptors in the brain. Early discrimination work with phytocannabinoids confirmed that Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) is the primary psychoactive constituent of the marijuana plant, with more recent work focusing on characterization of the contribution of the major endocannabinoids, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), to Δ9-THC-like internal states. Collectively, these latter studies suggest that endogenous increases in both anandamide and 2-AG seem to be optimal for mimicking Δ9-THC's discriminative stimulus effects, although suprathreshold concentrations of anandamide also appear to be Δ9-THC-like in discrimination assays. Recently, increased abuse of synthetic cannabinoids (e.g., "fake marijuana") has spurred discrimination studies to inform regulatory authorities by predicting which of the many synthetic compounds on the illicit market are most likely to share Δ9-THC's abuse liability. In the absence of a reliable model of cannabinoid self-administration (specifically, Δ9-THC self-administration), cannabinoid discrimination represents the most validated and pharmacologically selective animal model of an abuse-related property of cannabinoids - i.e., marijuana's subjective effects. The influx of recent papers in which cannabinoid discrimination is highlighted attests to its continued relevance as a valuable method for scientific study of cannabinoid use and abuse.

Citations in the library

Explore topics