Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Phytocannabinoids, Endocannabinoids, and Synthetic Cannabinoids.
Jenny L Wiley, R Allen Owens, Aron H Lichtman
Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2018 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2016_24 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | 2-arachidonoylglycerol Anandamide Endocannabinoids Faah inhibitors Magl inhibitors Synthetic cannabinoids δ9-THC |
| Key findings | The review concludes that cannabinoids from plants, the body, and laboratories produce their discriminative stimulus effects mainly through CB1 receptor stimulation, and that endogenous increases in both anandamide and 2-AG seem optimal for mimicking THC's discriminative effects. It argues that cannabinoid discrimination remains the most validated animal model of marijuana's subjective effects and is useful for predicting the abuse liability of synthetic cannabinoids. |
Abstract
Psychoactive cannabinoids from the marijuana plant (phytocannabinoids), from the body (endocannabinoids), and from the research lab (synthetic cannabinoids) produce their discriminative stimulus effects by stimulation of CB1 receptors in the brain. Early discrimination work with phytocannabinoids confirmed that Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) is the primary psychoactive constituent of the marijuana plant, with more recent work focusing on characterization of the contribution of the major endocannabinoids, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), to Δ9-THC-like internal states. Collectively, these latter studies suggest that endogenous increases in both anandamide and 2-AG seem to be optimal for mimicking Δ9-THC's discriminative stimulus effects, although suprathreshold concentrations of anandamide also appear to be Δ9-THC-like in discrimination assays. Recently, increased abuse of synthetic cannabinoids (e.g., "fake marijuana") has spurred discrimination studies to inform regulatory authorities by predicting which of the many synthetic compounds on the illicit market are most likely to share Δ9-THC's abuse liability. In the absence of a reliable model of cannabinoid self-administration (specifically, Δ9-THC self-administration), cannabinoid discrimination represents the most validated and pharmacologically selective animal model of an abuse-related property of cannabinoids - i.e., marijuana's subjective effects. The influx of recent papers in which cannabinoid discrimination is highlighted attests to its continued relevance as a valuable method for scientific study of cannabinoid use and abuse.
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- Evaluation of cannabimimetic effects of selected minor cannabinoids and Terpenoids in mice. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry June 8, 2024
- The Pharmacology of Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) The Science of Marijuana 2019
- Peripheral and Central Effects of THC The Science of Marijuana 2019
- Inhibition of the endocannabinoid-regulating enzyme monoacylglycerol lipase elicits a CB1 receptor-mediated discriminative stimulus in mice. Neuropharmacology October 2017
- Comparison of the discriminative stimulus and response rate effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and synthetic cannabinoids in female and male rats. Drug and Alcohol Dependence March 1, 2017
Cites 36
- Just add water: cannabinoid discrimination in a water T-maze with FAAH(-/-) and FAAH(+/+) mice. Behavioural Pharmacology August 2016
- Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-like effects of novel synthetic cannabinoids found on the gray market. Behavioural Pharmacology August 2015
- Phenotypic assessment of THC discriminative stimulus properties in fatty acid amide hydrolase knockout and wildtype mice. Neuropharmacology June 2015
- Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-like discriminative stimulus effects of compounds commonly found in K2/Spice. Behavioural Pharmacology December 2014
- Cross-substitution of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and JWH-018 in drug discrimination in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior September 2014
and 31 more in the library