Skip to content

Cannabis use and vulnerability for psychosis in early adolescence—a TRAILS study

Merel F. H. Griffith‐Lendering, Johanna T. W. Wigman, Andrea Prince van Leeuwen, Stephan C. J. Huijbregts, Anja C. Huizink, Johan Ormel, Frank C Verhulst, Jim van Os, Hanna Swaab, Wilma Vollebergh

Addiction December 10, 2012 DOI: 10.1111/add.12050 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort (cross-lagged path analysis) Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 2,120
Population Dutch adolescents in the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS), assessed at mean ages 13.6, 16.3, and 19.1
Duration Three assessments at mean ages 13.6, 16.3, and 19.1 years
Measures Youth Self-Report (thought problems, social problems, attention problems subscales), Adult Self-Report (thought problems, social problems, attention problems subscales), self-reported past-year cannabis use
Topics Cannabis
Citations 67
Key findings Cannabis use at age 16 predicted psychosis vulnerability at age 19, and psychosis vulnerability at ages 13 and 16 predicted later cannabis use, indicating a bidirectional association. The authors suggest this reflects a bidirectional causal relationship between the two.

Abstract

Aims: To examine the direction of the longitudinal association between vulnerability for psychosis and cannabis use throughout adolescence.

Design: Cross-lagged path analysis was used to identify the temporal order of vulnerability for psychosis and cannabis use, while controlling for gender, family psychopathology, alcohol use and tobacco use.

Setting: A large prospective population study of Dutch adolescents [the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) study].

Participants: A total of 2120 adolescents with assessments at (mean) age 13.6, age 16.3 and age 19.1.

Measurements: Vulnerability for psychosis at the three assessment points was represented by latent factors derived from scores on three scales of the Youth Self-Report and the Adult Self-Report, i.e. thought problems, social problems and attention problems. Participants self-reported on cannabis use during the past year at all three waves.

Findings: Significant associations (r = 0.12-0.23) were observed between psychosis vulnerability and cannabis use at all assessments. Also, cannabis use at age 16 predicted psychosis vulnerability at age 19 (Z = 2.6, P < 0.05). Furthermore, psychosis vulnerability at ages 13 (Z = 2.0, P < 0.05) and 16 (Z = 3.0, P < 0.05) predicted cannabis use at, respectively, ages 16 and 19.

Conclusions: Cannabis use predicts psychosis vulnerability in adolescents and vice versa, which suggests that there is a bidirectional causal association between the two.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis People with first episode of psychosis and healthy controls from the local population 2009 Case-control study n = 454
Ayahuasca-Assisted Therapy for Addiction: Results from a Preliminary Observational Study in Canada Rural aboriginal population 2013 Observational study
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
Continued cannabis use and risk of incidence and persistence of psychotic symptoms: 10 year follow-up cohort study Individuals from the general population in Germany aged 14-24 at baseline 2011 Observational cohort n = 1,923
Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: follow-up study of 535 incident cases Patients treated for cannabis-induced psychotic symptoms in Denmark between 1994 and... 2005 Observational cohort n = 535

Citations in the library

Cited by 10

and 5 more in the library

Cites 9

and 4 more in the library

Explore topics