Skip to content

Harm reduction and knowledge exchange-a qualitative analysis of drug-related Internet discussion forums.

Christophe Soussan, Anette Kjellgren

Harm Reduction Journal September 8, 2014 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-25 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Qualitative study Peer reviewed
Population Posts and discussion threads about novel psychoactive substances on three international Internet forums
Keywords Humans Substance-related disorders Psychotropic drugs Information dissemination Harm reduction Dose-response relationship, drug Internet Social media
Key findings The authors report that forum discussions were characterized by a social process of mutual support and cumulative knowledge-sharing about novel psychoactive substances, organized into four themes: substance facts, dosage and administration, subjective effects, and support and safety. They argue that although this publicly available knowledge could increase drug use, the discussions mainly reflected concern for safety and harm reduction rather than recruiting new users, and propose such forums could serve as sites for drug prevention and further research.

Abstract

Background: Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are continuously and increasingly appearing on the international drug market. Global Internet forums are a publicly available reality where users anonymously discuss and share information about NPS. The aim of this study was to explore and characterize the discussions about NPS on international Internet forums.

Methods: The most post-frequent NPS discussions were collected from three "leading edge" international Internet forums. A total of 13,082 posts from 60 threads of discussion were systematically examined and interpreted to reveal recurring topics and patterns. Each thread was coded with emerging topics and supporting quotations from the data set. Eventually, codes with coherent meaning were arranged into 51 broader categories of abstraction, which were combined into four overarching themes.

Results: Four themes emerged during the analysis: (1) uncovering the substance facts, (2) dosage and administration, (3) subjectively experienced effects, and (4) support and safety. The first theme dealt primarily with substance identification, pharmacology, and assessed not only purity but also legal status and acquisition. The second theme focused on administration techniques, dose recommendations, technical talk about equipment, and preferred settings for drug use. The third theme involved a multitude of self-reported experiences, in which many different aspects of intoxication were depicted in great detail. The users emphasized both positive and negative experiences. The last theme incorporated the efforts of the communities to prevent and minimize harm by sharing information about potential risks of the harmful effects or contraindications of a substance. Also, online support and guidance were given to intoxicated persons who experienced bad or fearful reactions.

Conclusions: The findings showed that the discussions were characterized by a social process in which users supported each other and exchanged an extensive and cumulative amount of knowledge about NPS and how to use them safely. Although this publicly available knowledge could entail an increase in drug use, the main characteristics of the discussions in general were a concern for safety and harm reduction, not for recruiting new users. Drug-related Internet forums could be used as a location for drug prevention, as well as a source of information for further research about NPS.

Citations in the library

Cited by 17

and 12 more in the library

Cites 7

and 2 more in the library