Skip to content

Mysticism and Ethics

W. Wainwright

International Encyclopedia of Ethics February 1, 2013 DOI: 10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee129 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Key points Argues that the relation between mysticism and ethics is not as straightforward as the dominant view, expressed by Steven T. Katz, suggests. While Katz claims no major mystical figures or traditions preach moral indifference or immorality, the author contends this consensus oversimplifies the issue, in contrast to arguments by Albert Schweitzer, Arthur Danto, and others that mystical consciousness and morality are incompatible.

Abstract

The relation between mysticism and ethics is contentious. Albert Schweitzer, Arthur Danto, and others have argued that mystical consciousness and morality are incompatible. The dominant view is expressed by Steven T. Katz, however: “it is difficult to find any major mystical figures, or mystical traditions, that can be said to preach moral indifference; and certainly none preach immorality” (1992: 254). But the issue is not so straightforward. Keywords: altruism; benevolence; charity; Christianity; comparative philosophy; ethics; Indian philosophy; philosophy of religion

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics