Skip to content

Neoplatonic "Tree of Life" (Arbor Porphyriana: A diagram of logic and mystical theology

Amer Dardagan

DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/g2qxe (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis
Key points Argues that the Tree of Porphyry, a diagram of Aristotle's five predicables, was transmitted through Neoplatonic-Aristotelianism into medieval logic and mystical traditions, and that under Neoplatonic procession and reversion, mystics must oscillate between cataphatic affirmation and apophatic negation to truly know God.

Abstract

In several versions of „Introduction to Aristotle's Categories“ („The Isagoge“) we find very intriguing diagram of the "Tree of Porphyry". This diagram is closely linked with the square of opposition (logical square), natural tree with vegetative ornaments and the anthropomorphic figure. Porphyry took over Aristotle's division into five predicables (quinque praedicabilia) and defined them through five classes (species, genus, differentia, propria, accidentia) and from them he created scala praedicamentalis (Arbor Porphyriana). The Neoplatonic-Aristotelianism of Porphyry influenced the return of interest in Aristotle's logic in the Middle Ages through translations of Boethius and Al-Farabi. Their works of logic were the basis for the study of many topics, especially those related to theology. Later diagrams with the natural tree and human figure (syndesmos) are found in the 13th century in "Tractatus" („Summulae Logicales“) written by Peter of Spain under different names such as: Tree of Love, Tree of Life, Tree of Science, Tree of Knowledge etc. Christian mysticism (Mystical theology), Islamic mysticism (Sufism) and Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah) was deeply influenced by Neoplatonic philosophy and within these mystical traditions we find different variations of the diagram aswell. Under the influence of the concept of Neoplatonic procession and reversion, mystic should be simultaneously involved in both Cataphatic and Apophatic theology to truly understand God. In other words, a spiritual person has to oscillate between affirming claims about the Tree of Life (the Being) and negation of those same claims to be able to have real knowledge of God.

Explore topics