Skip to content

Buddhism, Happiness, and the Science of Meditation

William Edelglass

Oxford Scholarship Online October 19, 2017 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190495794.003.0004 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Meditation
Key points Argues that the scientific study of meditation and happiness is not value neutral: life satisfaction questionnaires and random experience sampling each carry a particular theory of happiness, with experience sampling assuming a hedonic conception of happiness as positive affect or pleasure. Contrasts this with Śāntideva's view that mindfulness and awareness entail relinquishing the self and increasing skill in addressing others' needs, showing that empirical research reframes the meaning of meditation.

Abstract

The widespread discourse of happiness and meditation is part of a “happiness turn” in contemporary Western Buddhism, in which meditation is presented as a path to happiness. This turn is justified, in part, by empirical research on happiness, which appears to be a straightforward scientific inquiry into the causes and conditions of happiness. The two most widespread methods for measuring happiness, life satisfaction questionnaires and random experience sampling, are each committed to a particular theory of happiness: implicit in the random experience sampling method is a hedonic conception of happiness as positive affect or pleasure. In contrast, Śāntideva suggests that cultivating mindfulness and awareness entails relinquishing of self and increasing skill in addressing others’ needs. This contrast demonstrates that the scientific study of meditation and happiness is not value neutral but reframes the meaning of meditation.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics