Skip to content

Sporadic use of classic psychedelics and neuropsychological performance: A cross-sectional analysis.

Simon Reiche, Tim Hirschfeld, Anna Lena Gröticke, Marie Traub, Nicklas Jakob Hafiz, Rico Haas, Lara Sedlaczek, Linda Ortlieb, Georg Leistenschneider, Lukas A Basedow, Andrea Lohse, Felix Bermpohl, Thomas Günther Riemer, Tomislav Majić

Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry April 2, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111353 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional, exploratory study Peer reviewed
Sample size 136
Population Individuals aged 18-50 with mild to moderate lifetime use of psychedelics and matched controls
Topics LSD Psilocybin
Keywords Cognitive flexibility Neuropsychological performance Psychedelics hallucinogens Entheogens Brain function Executive function Problem solving
Citations 5
Key findings Sporadic lifetime use of classic psychedelics was associated with modestly superior executive function, especially cognitive flexibility on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, with no detected negative cognitive effects.

Abstract

Evidence on the neuropsychological consequences of classic psychedelics like psilocybin, LSD, and ayahuasca is conflicting, and little is known about how sporadic use of psychedelics under naturalistic conditions may affect cognitive functioning. Given the growing interest in the therapeutic potential of psychedelics and the rise in non-medical use, further exploration into their neuropsychological effects is needed. This cross-sectional, exploratory study employed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to assess cognitive domains such as executive function, memory, attention, and visuospatial abilities among individuals with mild to moderate lifetime use of psychedelics. Analyses compared all users to non-users, moderate users to matched controls, and adjusted dose-response analyses were conducted within the users group. From 2611 screened individuals, N = 136 participants (84 psychedelic users and 52 controls) were included. Participants were aged 18-50 years. Neuropsychological performance was broadly equivalent between users and controls. However, matched-pair analyses showed that psychedelic users had a modest advantage in executive functions, especially superior performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) (p < .05). Dose-response analyses further corroborated these findings, indicating a positive association between lifetime psychedelic use and performance on the WCST, specifically total errors (p < .001), perseverative responses (p < .001), perseverative errors (p < .001), non-perseverative errors (p = .008), and conceptual level responses (p = .004). The study did not detect any negative associations between sporadic lifetime psychedelic use and cognition. Instead, a moderate association with executive functioning was found, indicating increased cognitive flexibility in users. Dose-response analyses further supported this relationship.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on LSD, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Survey of subjective "God encounter experiences": Comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT Adults reporting a single most memorable God encounter experience, either nondrug or... 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 4,285
Patterns of recreational drug use at dance events in Edinburgh, Scotland Drug users at dance events in Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, aged 16-47, 80% between 18 and... 2001 Cross-sectional survey n = 122
Development of the Psychological Insight Questionnaire among a sample of people who have consumed psilocybin or LSD Psilocybin and LSD users 2021 Cross-sectional survey study n = 1,661
Prevalence and associations of challenging, difficult or distressing experiences using classic psychedelics. US adult population 2023 Cross-sectional survey n = 2,822
Trends in LSD use among US adults: 2015-2018. US adults ages 18 and older 2020 Secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data n = 168,562

Citations in the library

Explore topics