Skip to content

From ecstasy to MDMA: Recreational drug use, symbolic boundaries, and drug trends.

Marit Edland-Gryt, Sveinung Sandberg, Willy Pedersen

International Journal of Drug Policy December 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.030 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Qualitative study Peer reviewed
Sample size 31
Population Young adult party-goers and recreational MDMA/ecstasy users in Oslo, Norway, aged 20-34 (mean age 26.2 years, 61.3% male)
Topics MDMA
Keywords Club drug use Ecstasy pills Lay epidemiology MDMA Crystals Recreational substance use Symbolic boundaries
Key findings Participants perceived MDMA crystals and powder as having better effects, being safer, and being less tied to out-of-fashion rave culture than "old ecstasy pills." The authors argue these perceived distinctions constitute symbolic boundary work that users employ to justify their drug use, and suggest this differentiation helps explain MDMA's re-emergence in Oslo's club scene despite both drugs sharing MDMA as the active ingredient.

Abstract

Ecstasy pills with MDMA as the main ingredient were introduced in many European countries in the 1980s, and were often linked to the rave and club scenes. However, use gradually levelled off, in part as a response to increased concerns about possible mental health consequences and fatalities. Extensive use of MDMA now seems to be re-emerging in many countries. In this study, we investigated the cultural and social meaning associated with MDMA use in Oslo, Norway, with an emphasis on how users distinguish MDMA crystals and powder from "old ecstasy pills". Qualitative in-depth interviews (n=31, 61,3% males) were conducted with young adult party-goers and recreational MDMA/ecstasy users (20-34 years old, mean age 26.2 years). Research participants emphasised three important perceived differences between the MDMA crystals and ecstasy pills: (i) The effects of MDMA were described as better than ecstasy; (ii) MDMA was regarded as a safer drug; (iii) Users of MDMA crystals were described as more distinct from and less anchored in out-of-fashion rave culture than those using ecstasy. These differences were an important part of the symbolic boundary work MDMA users engaged in when justifying their drug use. MDMA has re-emerged as an important psychoactive substance in Oslo's club scene. One important reason for this re-emergence seems to be its perceived differentiation from ecstasy pills, even though the active ingredient in both drugs is MDMA. This perceived distinction between MDMA and ecstasy reveals the importance of social and symbolic meanings in relation to psychoactive substance use. Insights from this study can be important in terms of understanding how trends in drug use develop and how certain drugs gain or lose popularity.

Comparable studies

Other qualitative studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Phenomenology and Sequelae of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine Use Psychiatrists who had taken MDMA 1992 Qualitative study n = 20
MDMA and Sexual Behavior: Ecstasy Users' Perceptions About Sexuality and Sexual Risk Current and former users of MDMA 2005 Qualitative study n = 98
Perceived Benefits of MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy beyond Symptom Reduction: Qualitative Follow-Up Study of a Clinical Trial for Individuals with Treatment-Resistant PTSD Veterans, firefighters, and police officers with chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD 2019 Qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis n = 19
Negative Experiences on Ecstasy: The Role of Drug, Set, and Setting Current or former users of Ecstasy 2002 Qualitative study n = 98
A Qualitative Exploration of Relational Ethical Challenges and Practices in Psychedelic Healing Practitioners who have administered MDMA and psilocybin to clients in underground... 2021 Qualitative study n = 23

Citations in the library

Cited by 12

and 7 more in the library

Cites 13

and 8 more in the library

Explore topics