Skip to content

Rethinking Social Cognition in Light of Psychosis: Reciprocal Implications for Cognition and Psychopathology

Vaughan Bell, Kathryn L. Mills, Gemma Modinos, Sam Wilkinson

Clinical Psychological Science February 10, 2017 DOI: 10.1177/2167702616677079 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Citations 47
Key findings Argues that current social cognition approaches are insufficient to explain the fundamentally social nature of psychotic experiences, and proposes that social agent representation is an important organizing principle for understanding social cognition, with alterations in it possibly contributing to delusions and hallucinations. Recommends empirical tests of specific hypotheses and broader measures of social reasoning.

Abstract

The positive symptoms of psychosis largely involve the experience of illusory social actors and yet our current measures of social cognition, at best, only weakly predict their presence. We review evidence to suggest that the range of current approaches in social cognition is not sufficient to explain the fundamentally social nature of these experiences. We argue that social agent representation is an important organising principle for understanding social cognition and that alterations in social agent representation may be a factor in the formation of delusions and hallucination in psychosis. We evaluate the feasibility of this approach in light of clinical and non-clinical studies, developmental research, cognitive anthropology and comparative psychology. We conclude with recommendations for empirical testing of specific hypotheses and how studies of social cognition could more fully capture the extent of social reasoning and experience in both psychosis and more prosaic mental states.

Citations in the library

Explore topics