Skip to content

The Era of Rapid-Acting Antidepressants: Clinical Insights Into Ketamine, Esketamine, and Scopolamine

Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Eduardo Pondé de Sena

Discovery medicine September 23, 2026 DOI: 10.24976/discov.med.202638212.235 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Adults with treatment-resistant depression; scopolamine trials enrolled patients with depressive disorders not restricted to protocol-defined TRD
Interventions Ketamine Esketamine Scopolamine sertraline duloxetine
Dose Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously over 40 minutes; esketamine 56 mg or 84 mg intranasally twice weekly; scopolamine 4 µg/kg intravenously
Duration Ketamine effects assessed from approximately 110 minutes with duration 1–2 weeks; esketamine over four weeks; scopolamine effects within 1–3 days
Measures Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Topics Esketamine Ketamine
Key findings The review reports that rapid-acting antidepressants produce rapid antidepressant responses in treatment-resistant depression, with the most consistent evidence for acute intravenous ketamine and maintenance intranasal esketamine. Intravenous ketamine had the fastest onset (about 110 minutes, response rates up to 70% at 24 hours) but limited duration of 1–2 weeks; esketamine plus oral antidepressants reduced MADRS scores over four weeks and lowered relapse risk (HR 0.49). Scopolamine showed effects within 1–3 days but less consistency, and the authors consider it still experimental.

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a major clinical challenge, being associated with high morbidity, increased suicide risk, and substantial socioeconomic burden. The need for rapidly acting interventions has driven the development of rapid-acting antidepressants (RAADs), such as ketamine, esketamine, and scopolamine. This study aimed to systematically review the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of these agents in TRD.Methods: Systematic review conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between January 2000 and September 2025. Randomized clinical trials involving adults with TRD were included. The scopolamine trials enrolled patients with depressive disorders and were not restricted to protocol-defined TRD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The screening and data extraction processes were independently performed by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus or consultation with a third reviewer.Results: Seven clinical trials were included (2 ketamine, 3 esketamine, 2 scopolamine). Intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes) demonstrated onset of effect at approximately 110 minutes, with response rates up to 70% at 24 hours, although with limited duration (1–2 weeks). Intranasal esketamine (56 mg or 84 mg twice weekly), combined with oral antidepressants such as escitalopram, sertraline, duloxetine, or venlafaxine extended release (XR), significantly reduced Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over four weeks and lowered relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49). Intravenous scopolamine (4 µg/kg) showed effects within 1–3 days but with less consistency in larger samples.Conclusion: RAADs provide rapid antidepressant responses in TRD. Evidence is more consistent for acute intravenous ketamine use and for maintenance treatment with intranasal esketamine. Intravenous ketamine demonstrated the fastest onset of action, whereas esketamine presented stronger evidence for long-term maintenance and relapse prevention. Scopolamine remains experimental.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • The review reports that intranasal esketamine plus oral antidepressants reduced MADRS scores over four weeks and lowered relapse risk (HR 0.49), with the most consistent evidence for maintenance intranasal esketamine.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
The acute antisuicidal effects of single-dose intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine in individuals with major depression and bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in randomized controlled trials of ketamine for suicidal ideation 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 197
Therapeutic Potentials of Ketamine and Esketamine in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Substance Use Disorders (SUD) and Eating Disorders (ED): A Review of the Current Literature 2021 Systematic review
Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with major depressive disorder who are treatment-resistant or acutely suicidal 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 774
Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2025 Systematic review and meta-analysis

Explore topics