The European Portuguese Version of the Determinants of Meditation Practice Inventory-Revised (DMPI-R).
Bárbara Monteiro, Ana Galhardo, Marina Cunha, José Pinto-Gouveia
Mindfulness August 10, 2022 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-022-01953-0 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Psychometric validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 383 |
| Population | Portuguese general-population adults who do not meditate (154 in the exploratory sample, 229 in the confirmatory sample) |
| Measures | Determinants of Meditation Practice Inventory-Revised (DMPI-R) |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Assessment Psychometric properties Barriers Factor structure |
| Key points | The European Portuguese DMPI-R shows a four-factor structure (low perceived benefit, inadequate knowledge, pragmatic barriers, socio-cultural conflict) with adequate reliability and test-retest stability. A four-factor model excluding item 10 had the lowest Expected Cross-Validation Index. Scores correlated with experiential avoidance and perspectives on meditation, with no significant sex, age, or education differences. |
Abstract
Objectives: Meditation practice has beneficial effects on physical and mental health, and barriers to regular practice have been recognized. The Determinants of Meditation Practice Inventory (DMPI) was developed and recently revised (DMPI-R). DMPI-R is a 12-item self-report instrument encompassing four dimensions: low perceived benefit, perceived inadequate knowledge, perceived pragmatic barriers, and perceived socio-cultural conflict. The current study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties and factor structure of the European Portuguese version of the DMPI-R in a general population Portuguese sample (non-meditators).
Methods: A sample comprising 154 participants completed a set of self-report measures online. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and parallel analyses were conducted to decide on the number of factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was computed in an independent sample (N = 229). Three models were tested and compared. Reliability and validity were analyzed.
Results: The EFA and parallel analysis revealed a four-factor structure. The three models tested showed a good fit to the data. Models' comparison pointed that the four-factor model, excluding item 10, was the one with the lower Expected Cross-Validation Index. The DMPI-R factors revealed adequate reliability and test-retest stability. The DMPI-R showed correlations with experiential avoidance and perspectives on meditation. No significant differences were found between men and women on the DMPI-R four factors. No significant associations with age and years of education were found.
Conclusions: The European Portuguese version of DMPI-R is a reliable and valid self-report instrument to assess perceived barriers to meditation, contributing to expand research and support meditation instructors in improving meditation programs.
Citations in the library
Cites 9
- Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation Perspectives on Psychological Science October 10, 2017
- What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft Psychological Medicine December 29, 2016
- Home practice in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participants' mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes Behaviour Research and Therapy May 10, 2017
- The Empirical Status of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of 44 Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials Perspectives on Psychological Science February 16, 2021
- Defining and measuring meditation-related adverse effects in mindfulness-based programs Clinical Psychological Science May 18, 2021
and 4 more in the library