Skip to content

A systematic review of income and education reporting in psychedelic clinical trials

Daniel H. Grossman, Kevin R. Madden, Nicky J. Mehtani, Brian T Anderson, Lori L. Davis, Jennifer Mitchell, Peter S. Hendricks

Nature Mental Health May 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s44220-025-00417-3 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 98
Population Articles on classic psychedelics and MDMA for mental health conditions
Topics Psychedelic-assisted therapy
Keywords Psychedelic treatment Hallucinogen-assisted therapy Entheogenic medicine Clinical trials Research studies Medical trials Drug trials Clinical research Diversity in research Participant diversity Research equity Inclusion in studies Socioeconomic diversity Demographic representation Health equity Healthcare access Equitable healthcare Treatment accessibility Health disparities
Citations 10
Key findings Socioeconomic status is widely underreported in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials, and US trial participants have substantially higher SES than the general population.

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) substantially influences mental health outcomes and treatment access, yet its reporting in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials remains underexplored. Here we systematically reviewed 98 articles (49 primary trials and 49 secondary analyses) published between 2006 and 2024 examining classic psychedelics and MDMA for mental health conditions. Only 12% of primary trials reported participant income data, and 31% reported educational attainment. In US-based trials, participants showed markedly higher SES than the general population: 93% had some college education (versus 62% nationally), and median incomes in major trials substantially exceeded the national median for all workers. Non-US trials showed variable patterns. This widespread underreporting of SES data and evidence of socioeconomic disparities, particularly in US trials, highlights an urgent need for standardized SES reporting and targeted strategies to improve socioeconomic diversity in psychedelic-assisted therapy research, ensuring broader generalizability and access to these emerging treatments

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psychedelic-assisted therapy, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
A Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy 2020 Systematic review
Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy—A Systematic Review of Associated Psychological Interventions 2022 Systematic review
Psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in studies of psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms (Major... 2023 Systematic review with meta-analysis n = 14
Psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients diagnosed with life-threatening illnesses or major depressive disorder 2023 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 686
Treating posttraumatic stress disorder with MDMA-assisted psychotherapy: A preliminary meta-analysis and comparison to prolonged exposure therapy Patients with PTSD 2016 Meta-analysis

Citations in the library

Cited by 14

and 9 more in the library

Cites 38

and 33 more in the library

Explore topics