Skip to content

731 Who is most at risk for nightmares? Demographic and psychosocial differences in nightmare prevalence among nurses

J. Martinez, B. Santiago, Danica C. Slavish, Jessica R. Dietch, B. Messman, Kimberly Kelly, C. Ruggero, Daniel J. Taylor

May 3, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab072.728 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study
Sample size 462
Population Nurses (91% female; mean age 39.03 years, SD 11.07; 78% White; 10% Hispanic/Latinx)
Duration 2 weeks of daily nightmare reports
Measures Nightmare Disorder Index (NDI), daily nightmare frequency reports
Topics Dreaming
Key findings Nightmare prevalence among nurses differed by assessment method: 51% by the retrospective Nightmare Disorder Index and 41% by two weeks of daily reports. Both measures were associated with higher PTSD, anxiety, depression, and perceived stress; only the retrospective measure showed demographic differences (younger age, female sex, fewer children, intermediate versus morning chronotype). The authors argue that demographic and psychosocial correlates of nightmares may depend on how nightmares are assessed.

Abstract

Nurses are subject to stressful work environments, which may negatively impact their sleep and increase their risk for nightmares. Previous studies have shown that women, night shift workers, and individuals with comorbid psychological conditions are more likely to report nightmares. Yet no studies have comprehensively examined demographic and psychosocial factors of nightmares among nurses. To address this gap, we examined demographic (age, gender, race, ethnicity, number of children, marital status, shift work status) and psychosocial (chronotype, PTSD, anxiety, depression, perceived stress) correlates of nightmares in a sample of 462 nurses (91% female; mean age = 39.03, SD = 11.07; 78% White; 10% Hispanic/Latinx). Nightmares were determined two ways: 1) using a newly validated retrospective survey measure, the Nightmare Disorder Index (NDI), and 2) using aggregated prospective reports of daily nightmare frequency across 2 weeks (nurses who reported any nightmares in the past 2 weeks were classified as having nightmares). Nurses experiencing nightmares as determined by the NDI (n = 236; 51%) were younger, more likely to be female, less likely to have children, more likely to be an intermediate chronotype, less likely to be a morning chronotype, and had higher mean levels of PTSD, anxiety, depression, and perceived stress than nurses without nightmares. Nurses experiencing nightmares as determined by daily surveys (n = 191; 41%) were not different in terms of any demographic characteristics, but had higher levels of PTSD, anxiety, depression, and perceived stress than those nurses without nightmares. Demographic and psychosocial differences in nightmare prevalence may differ based on how nightmares are assessed (i.e., retrospective vs. prospective measures). Overall, nurses with higher stress, PTSD, depression, and anxiety may be at greatest risk of having nightmares. Future studies should examine if targeting these factors results in improvements in sleep and well-being among nurses. NIH/NIAID R01AI128359-01

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... 2009 Observational study n = 6
Nightmare Prevalence, Nightmare Distress, and Self-Reported Psychological Disturbance Young adults with a mean age of 20 years 2002 Prospective observational study n = 116
Long-term effects of extreme situational stress on sleep and dreaming Survivors of traumatic events who complained of sleep disturbances, compared with... 1987 Case-control study n = 11
The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well‐being Adults who reported dreams 2004 Observational cohort n = 147
Dreaming in NREM Sleep: A High-Density EEG Study of Slow Waves and Spindles Healthy human subjects 2018 Observational cohort n = 14

Citations in the library

Explore topics