0667 A digital prescription therapeutic device to treat nightmare disorders: A case series
Brian D. Robertson, A. Liem
Sleep May 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0667 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Case series Case report Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 14 |
| Population | Patients with nightmare disorder and PTSD-associated nightmares |
| Intervention | NightWare |
| Measures | Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Change |
| Topics | Dreaming |
| Key findings | In this 14-patient case series, 10 patients who used NightWare for more than 7 days showed improvement in nightmares and sleep, with a mean CGI Change score of 2.20 (SD 0.79) versus baseline CGI Severity of 4.7 (SD 1.25). The authors report the improvement exceeded that seen with prazosin in the six patients who had previously taken prazosin (mean CGI Change 3.16, SD 0.41) and conclude that selecting patients with sympathetic nervous system activation may be important for device effectiveness. |
Abstract
Introduction: Nightmare disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-associated nightmares can be treatment-resistant in many patients. There are no recommended treatments for these conditions currently.
Methods: NightWare is a novel FDA-approved class II medical device which improves sleep in patients with nightmare disorder and PTSD-associated nightmares. It uses data from a smart watch to determine when nightmares are happening using heart rate and movement sensors, and then intervenes to interrupt the nightmare and improve overall sleep quality. We report the 14 consecutive cases of patients using NightWare and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Severity and Change in their sleep and reduction of nightmare burden.
Results: Of the 14 patients in this series, 10 patients used the device for more than 7 days. 1 discontinued due to perceived lack of efficacy, 2 stopped in part due to a skin rash, and one stopped because he did not want to wear a watch to sleep. At baseline, the 10 patients included in the analysis had a mean CGI Severity score of 4.7 (SD 1.25), which indicates moderate to severe nightmares and daytime dysfunction. Improvement in the CGI Change score with NightWare exceeded that of prazosin for this group of patients. The patients in this series that used the device had a mean score of 2.20 (SD 0.79) on the CGI Change scale, which indicates there was significant improvement from baseline. Six of the 10 patients using NightWare were also taking prazosin prior to starting NightWare. The prazosin dose ranged from 1-8 mg nightly for these patients. These 6 patients had minimal improvement with prazosin alone (CGIC of 3.16 (SD 0.41).
Conclusion: In this case series, NightWare significantly improved the symptoms of nightmare disorder in 10 of the 14 patients in this series. Patient selection for sympathetic nervous system activation is important to ensure the device’s effectiveness.
Comparable studies
Other case reports and case series on dreaming, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucid Dreaming as a Learnable Skill: A Case Study The author | 1980 | Case study | n = 1 |
| Lucid Dreaming as a Treatment for Recurrent Nightmares People with recurrent nightmares | 2010 | Case study | n = 5 |
| Treating Chronic Nightmares of Sexual Assault Survivors with an Intellectual Disability – Two Descriptive Case Studies Adults with learning disabilities suffering from post-traumatic nightmares | 2006 | Case study | n = 2 |
| Lucid dreaming: Correspondence between dreamed and actual events in one subject during rem sleep A lucid dreamer | 1984 | Case study | n = 1 |
| Lucid dreaming treatment for nightmares: A series of cases. Participants with nightmares | 2003 | Case series | n = 8 |