Corrigendum: Ayahuasca-induced personal death experiences: prevalence, characteristics, and impact on attitudes toward death, life, and the environment.
Jonathan David, José Carlos Bouso, Maja Kohek, Genís Ona, Nir Tadmor, Tal Arnon, Yair Dor-Ziderman, Aviva Berkovich-Ohana
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2025 correction DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1595067 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Topics | Ayahuasca |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Coping Environmental concern Life fulfillment Plant medicine Psychedelics hallucinogens Entheogens Mortality death Dying End-of-life Life and death Personal transformation self-discovery Spiritual growth Consciousness |
| Key points | The corrected average number of ayahuasca uses is 55.7, and the error does not change the article's conclusions. |
Abstract
1. In the published article, there was an error. The error was regarding the average number of ayahuasca uses in the ayahuasca group in Study 1. A correction has been made to the Results section in lines 387-390. This sentence previously stated:Briefly, on average, our study participants have used ayahuasca (mean = 69.4 ± 98.7), 6.4 times more than psilocybin (mean = 10.7 ± 15.4, U = 1378, p < 0.01, rp = 1), 5.7 times more than mescaline (mean = 12 ± 14.9, U = 351, p < 0.01, rp = 1), and 7.07 times more than LSD (mean = 9.9 ± 16.6, U = 976, p < 0.01, rp = 1).The corrected sentence appears below: Briefly, on average, our study participants have used ayahuasca (55.7 ± 82.1), 5.2 times more than psilocybin (mean = 10.7 ± 15.4, U = 1378, p < 0.01, rp = 1), 4.6 times more than mescaline (mean = 12 ± 14.9, U = 351, p < 0.01, rp = 1), and 5.6 times more than LSD (mean = 9.9 ± 16.6, U = 976, p < 0.01, rp = 1).The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3 Error in Figure/Table 2.In the published article, there was an error in Figure 2 Corrected Figure 1: