Relationship Between Personality Types in MBTI and Dream Structure Variables
Chuanwen Zhao, Jiaxi Wang, Xiaoling Feng, Heyong Shen
Frontiers in Psychology August 12, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01589 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Questionnaire experiment and dream diary experiment Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 410 |
| Population | Questionnaire respondents (N=410) and dream diary participants (N=47) |
| Measures | Myers-Briggs Type Indicator questionnaire (MBTI), Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE) |
| Citations | 7 |
| Key findings | Introverts reported greater emotional intensity and passive emotions in dreams and possibly more nightmare distress than extraverts, while extraverts shared dreams more often. Intuitive types had more positive dream attitudes and gained more novel ideas from dreams than sensing types. In the diary study, intuitive types showed more metaphorical incorporation of waking events into dreams than sensing types, which the authors suggest supports the dream continuity hypothesis. |
Abstract
This study aimed to explore relationships between personality type variables and dream structure variables. In the questionnaire experiment (N=410), we investigated associations between different personality variables in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator questionnaire (MBTI) and various aspects of dreams in the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). The MBTI has four dimensions. In the Extroversion/Introversion (E/I) dimension, I types dreamt more of emotional intensity and passive emotions than E types. Besides, I types may get more distressing in nightmares than E types. E types were more frequent to share their dreams with others. In the Sensation/Intuition (S/N) dimension, N types had a more positive attitude towards dreams and can get more novel ideas and helps from their dreams than S types. In the dream diary experiment (N=47), we investigated whether the S/N dimension may influence waking events' incorporating into dreams. External judges decoded paired waking events and dream reports. N types had more metaphorical incorporation than S types. More specifically, N types had more metaphorical expressions in their dreams than S types. This result may be due to the different characteristics between S types and N types. It may give support for the dream continuity hypothesis.
Citations in the library
Cites 12
- Jungian personality typology and the recall of everyday and archetypal dreams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986
- An Attempt at Matching Waking Events Into Dream Reports by Independent Judges Frontiers in Psychology April 6, 2018
- Beyond the neuropsychology of dreaming: Insights into the neural basis of dreaming with new techniques of sleep recording and analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews October 1, 2017
- Dream Sharing, Dream Recall, and Personality in Adolescents and Adults Imagination, Cognition and Personality September 1, 2016
- Dreaming and personality: Wake-dream continuity, thought suppression, and the Big Five Inventory. Consciousness and Cognition December 15, 2015
and 7 more in the library