Skip to content

God is Unconscious. Of an Other Enjoyment. Psychoanalytical Attempt at an Atheistic Mysticism

Georg Gröller

Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society July 7, 2022 DOI: 10.30965/23642807-bja10036 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Citations 3
Key points Argues that mysticism and psychoanalysis share structural epistemological and ethical equivalences, which makes mysticism's central concerns accessible to contemporary secular thought. The author contends that mysticism should not be misunderstood as a moral enterprise of self-perfection, and proposes opposing the contemporary "guiding culture" of enjoyment with an ethics of desire.

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this essay is to elaborate structural epistemological and ethical equivalences between mysticism and psychoanalysis. This allows us to make the central concerns of mysticism accessible to contemporary secular thought. The article is driven by two intentions: on the one hand, not to misunderstand mysticism as a moral enterprise of self-perfection, and on the other hand, to oppose the contemporary “guiding culture” of enjoyment with an ethics of desire.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics