Skip to content

Mindfulness-based programmes and 'bigger than self' issues: protocol for a scoping review.

Robert John Callen-Davies, Jamie Bristow, Taranah Gazder, Gemma M Griffith, Yasmin Noorani, Rebecca Susan Crane

BMJ Open March 15, 2023 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067819 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Scoping review protocol Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Narration Peer review Research design Databases, factual Academies and institutes Public health Social medicine Qualitative research
Key findings The protocol proposes that a scoping review can map how mindfulness-based programmes may shift benefits from individual outcomes toward 'bigger than self' prosocial and collective change, and will describe the literature's quality, trends, theoretical models and gaps. The authors contend that such a review can inform and empower individual and collective responses to societal and global issues.

Abstract

Introduction: Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) have an established, growing evidence base as interventions to optimise health, well-being and performance of individual participants. Emerging evidence suggests that MBPs also enhance prosociality, encouraging individuals to contribute to positive social change. This study focuses on the potential of MBPs to facilitate development of participants' inner resources that support prosocial shifts. The review seeks to detect shifts in MBP benefit from individual toward 'bigger than self', informing and empowering individual and collective responses to complex societal and global issues. The review aims to map current literature on MBPs and social change, into a descriptive overview with commentary on quality, trends, theoretical models and gaps, and on how training in MBPs potentially enables individual and collective responses to societal and global issues. Recommendations for future directions for researchers seeking to advance this evidence base, and practitioners developing innovative MBPs for this purpose will be provided. Methods and analysis: A scoping review of peer-reviewed literature will be undertaken and reported on according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidance. Systematic searches of four scientific databases will be undertaken to identify potentially eligible articles published from all time to current date. Data will be extracted using an extraction template and analysed descriptively using narrative synthesis. Ethics and dissemination: This scoping review involves no human participants, so ethics is not required. Findings will be shared through professional networks, conference presentations and journal publication.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics