Skip to content

Subjective experience of aberrant salience in young people at Ultra-High Risk (UHR) for psychosis: a cross-sectional study

Michele Poletti, L. Pelizza, S. Azzali, S. Garlassi, I. Scazza, F. Paterlini, L. Chiri, S. Pupo, Andrea Raballo

Nordic Journal of Psychiatry June 29, 2021 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2021.1942547 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 226
Population Adolescents and young adults aged 13-35 years, comprising 87 Ultra-High Risk (UHR) and 139 First Episode Psychosis (FEP) help-seeking peers
Measures Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI), Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire brief version (SPQ-B)
Key findings Baseline subjective aberrant salience did not differ between UHR and FEP participants (median 14.50 vs 14). In UHR individuals, aberrant salience was significantly associated with attenuated positive symptoms, depression, and schizotypal traits (cognitive-perceptual deficits and disorganization). The authors conclude that aberrant salience is clinically relevant in UHR subjects, comparable to FEP patients, and seems to interact with schizotypy in attenuated positive psychopathology.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Aberrant salience (AS) is conceptualized as a potential predisposing factor for psychotic states of mind. Despite several studies in the general population, research on AS in the early phases of psychosis is still relatively scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional study is (1) to evaluate the AS subjective experience in Ultra-High Risk (UHR) adolescents and young adults compared to help-seeking peers with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) and (2) to assess any significant association of baseline AS with psychopathology and functioning in UHR participants. Materials and methods Participants (87 UHR and 139 FEP), aged 13–35 years, completed the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) and the brief version of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ-B). Within the UHR subgroup, Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression analyses among psychopathological parameters were performed.

Results: No difference in baseline AS subjective levels was found between UHR and FEP participants (median [interquartile range]: 14.50 [7–19] vs 14 [9–21]; z = −1.576; p = 0.115). In UHR individuals, the ASI total score was significantly associated with attenuated positive symptoms (ρ = 0.284, p = 0.008), depression (ρ = 0.256; p = 0.018) and specific schizotypal personality traits (i.e. cognitive-perceptual deficits and disorganization [respectively, ρ = 0.487, p = 0.001, and ρ = 0.295, p = 0.008]).

Conclusions: AS is clinically relevant in UHR subjects, comparable to FEP patients. Moreover, it seems to mutually interact with schizotypy in the clinical manifestation of attenuated positive psychopathology.

Citations in the library

Explore topics