Skip to content

Comparison of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia between Zen-meditation and Control Groups

Pei-Chen Lo, Bo-Ting Lyu, Wu Jue Miao Tian

OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine April 1, 2019 DOI: 10.21926/obm.icm.1902021 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study comparing groups Peer reviewed
Sample size 32
Population 25 healthy ordinary young people (control group) and 7 Zen-meditation practitioners (Zen-meditation group)
Measures RSA coefficient, RSA normal rate, time-domain HRV (heart-rate variability), conventional peak-valley method
Topics Buddhism Meditation
Key findings The proposed RSA coefficient and RSA normal rate were higher in Zen-meditation practitioners than in controls across sessions: Zen group coefficients averaged 0.81-0.86 versus control group values of 0.63-0.75, and RSA normal rate was 91.03% versus 80.48% during rest. The authors argue these time-domain measures provide a more reliable and direct estimate of RSA behavior than the conventional peak-valley method and that HHIS Zen meditation naturally elicits superior RSA performance compared with sophisticated breathing control.

Abstract

Background: This research aims to develop new methods to investigate the cardiorespiratory interaction of Zen-meditation practitioners (Zen-meditation group) and healthy ordinary young people (control group) by quantitatively evaluating respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) behavior.

Methods: Twenty-five voluntary controls and seven Zen-meditation practitioners were recruited. The experimental protocol involved five sessions of different mental-stress levels (control group) and five sessions of Zen-meditation practice (experimental group). Forty minute ECG and respiratory signals were recorded for each control subject; thirty for each experimental subject. By detecting R peaks, heart-rate sequence is constructed. Two methods are proposed to evaluate RSA behavior based on cycle-to-cycle synchronization between heart-rate and respiratory sequence.

Results: Based on the proposed method of computing for a RSA coefficient, the control group average for each session was 0.70 (Rest I), 0.65 (continuous attention task, CAT I), 0.75 (BC), 0.63 (CAT II) and 0.70 (Rest II); whereas the Zen-meditation group average was 0.81 (S1), 0.84 (S2), 0.84 (S3), 0.86 (S4) and 0.81 (S5), all superior to the control group. The average RSA normal rate in the Zen-meditation group (91.03%) remarkably surpassed the control group (80.48%) in the Rest sessions.

Conclusions: Using the time-domain HRV (heart-rate variability) as a reference, our methods, RSA coefficient and RSA normal rate, provide more reliable and direct estimate of RSA behavior than the conventional peak-valley method computing the inspiratory–expiratory difference in R-to-R interval of ECG. Moreover, results of the proposed methods confined in a specified range (RSA coefficient between 0 and 1, RSA normal rate between 0% and 100%) facilitate the interpretation of the quantitative RSA behavior. In the RSA analysis, breathing control sessions using anthropic interventions induced more prominent RSA activity in the control group. Nevertheless, HHIS Zen meditation, with excellent qi circulation activated by the ten-mailuns system, naturally (in the way of do-nothing) elicits superior RSA performance, better than sophisticated breathing control.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on buddhism, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
AN ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC STUDY ON THE ZEN MEDITATION (ZAZEN) Zen priests and disciples of Zen sects of Buddhism 1966 Observational study n = 48
“Thinking about Not-Thinking”: Neural Correlates of Conceptual Processing during Zen Meditation Regular Zen practitioners and matched control subjects 2008 Observational cohort
Individual Trait Anxiety Levels Characterizing the Properties of Zen Meditation Healthy adults who had not previously practiced any form of meditation 2004 Observational cohort n = 22
Zen meditation, Length of Telomeres, and the Role of Experiential Avoidance and Compassion 20 Zen meditation experts and 20 healthy matched non-meditators 2016 Observational cohort n = 40
EEG dynamics of experienced Zen meditation practitioners probed by complexity index and spectral measure Experienced Zen meditation practitioners and matched controls 2009 Observational cohort n = 46

Citations in the library

Explore topics