Skip to content

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Dana D. DiRenzo, Monica Crespo-Bosque, Neda F Gould, Patrick H. Finan, Julie Nanavati, Clifton O. Bingham

Current rheumatology reports October 18, 2018 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-018-0787-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 399
Population Patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions
Measures DAS28-CRP, Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Arthritis, rheumatoid Stress Rheumatoid arthritis Systematic review Mindfulness-based interventions
Key findings Across five randomized trials and one post-hoc analysis (399 participants), meta-analyses found no statistically significant effects of mindfulness-based interventions on DAS28-CRP disease activity or pain VAS, though individual studies reported some improvements. All four studies assessing psychological outcomes reported improvements in depressive symptoms, psychological distress, and self-efficacy. The authors suggest MBIs may be a useful strategy for psychological distress in RA, while noting the evidence base is small.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To determine the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent findings: We identified randomized clinical trials from inception through April 2018 from MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and hand searches. After screening 338 references, we included five trials with one post-hoc analysis that evaluated MBIs and collectively included 399 participants. Outcome instruments were heterogeneous across studies. Three studies evaluated RA clinical outcomes by a rheumatologist; one study found improvements in disease activity. A limited meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in the levels of DAS28-CRP in the two studies that evaluated this metric (- 0.44 (- 0.99, 0.12); I2 0%). Four studies evaluated heterogeneous psychological outcomes, and all found improvements including depressive symptoms, psychological distress, and self-efficacy. A meta-analysis of pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) levels post intervention from three included studies was not significantly different between MBI participants and control group (- 0.58 (- 1.26, 0.10); I2 0%) although other studies not included in meta-analysis found improvement. There are few trials evaluating the effect of MBIs on outcomes in patients with RA. Preliminary findings suggest that MBIs may be a useful strategy to improve psychological distress in those with RA.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics