Skip to content

Examining the associations of using the Calm app with team mindfulness and psychological safety in remote workers.

Megan E. Puzia, Jeni Green, Claire Clarke, Sara Cloonan, Jen Huberty

Environmental and occupational health practice 2022 DOI: 10.1539/eohp.2022-0001-oa (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional survey Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 437
Population Full-time remote employees in the United States whose employer health benefits included a Calm subscription
Topics Meditation
Keywords Mobile applications Psychological safety Team mindfulness Workplace climate
Key findings Among 437 full-time remote workers, opportunities to use Calm at work were positively associated with team mindfulness (β=2.39) and psychological safety (β=1.85); using Calm with team members was associated only with team mindfulness (β=2.99), and discussing Calm with team members only with psychological safety (β=1.17). The authors suggest creating workplace opportunities to engage with a mindfulness meditation app may help foster team mindfulness and psychological safety for remote workers.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to (1) illustrate how remote workers engage with an employer-provided mindfulness meditation app in the workplace and (2) examine the relationship between workplace app engagement, team mindfulness, and psychological safety among remote workers. A cross-sectional survey was administered to employees within the United States who had received a subscription to Calm as part of their health benefits. Employees reported on three types of engagement with the Calm app in the context of the workplace - opportunities use to Calm together during the workday, using Calm with team members, and discussing Calm content with teams - and completed measures of team mindfulness and psychological safety. Fixed-effects regression models were used to assess effects of workplace app engagement on psychological safety and team mindfulness in remote workers. Of 60,000 workers contacted, 801 employees completed the survey (1.3%) and 437 were full-time remote workers (0.7%). Only 20% of remote workers reported having opportunities to use Calm at work. Opportunities to use Calm at work was positively associated with team mindfulness (β=2.39, p=0.005) and psychological safety (β=1.85, p=0.005). Using Calm with team members was only significantly associated with team mindfulness (β=2.99, p=0.046) and discussing Calm with team members was only significantly associated with psychological safety (β=1.17, p=0.029). Creating opportunities for employees to engage with a mindfulness meditation app while at work may help foster team mindfulness and psychological safety, especially for remote workers. Considering the research limitations, future studies should investigate longitudinal relationships within workplace teams.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics