Skip to content

A neurostructural biomarker of dissociative amnesia: a hippocampal study in dissociative identity disorder

L. Dimitrova, Sophie L. Dean, Yolanda R. Schlumpf, E. Vissia, E. Nijenhuis, Vasiliki Chatzi, L. Jäncke, D. Veltman, S. Chalavi, A. Reinders

Psychological Medicine June 24, 2021 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721002154 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Case-control study Peer reviewed
Sample size 75
Population Women, 32 with dissociative identity disorder and 43 matched healthy controls
Measures Dissociative Experience Scale (DES), Freesurfer version 6.0 volumetric measures
Key findings Hippocampal volumes were smaller in women with dissociative identity disorder than in healthy controls in bilateral global hippocampus and several subfields. Dissociative amnesia was the only dissociative symptom uniquely and significantly correlated with reduced bilateral CA1 volumes, and emotional neglect was the only trauma measure negatively correlated with multiple hippocampal regions. The authors propose decreased CA1 volume as a biomarker for dissociative amnesia and suggest emotional neglect contributes to hippocampal volume reduction.

Abstract

Abstract Background Little is known about the neural correlates of dissociative amnesia, a transdiagnostic symptom mostly present in the dissociative disorders and core characteristic of dissociative identity disorder (DID). Given the vital role of the hippocampus in memory, a prime candidate for investigation is whether total and/or subfield hippocampal volume can serve as biological markers of dissociative amnesia.

Methods: A total of 75 women, 32 with DID and 43 matched healthy controls (HC), underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using Freesurfer (version 6.0), volumes were extracted for bilateral global hippocampus, cornu ammonis (CA) 1–4, the granule cell molecular layer of the dentate gyrus (GC-ML-DG), fimbria, hippocampal−amygdaloid transition area (HATA), parasubiculum, presubiculum and subiculum. Analyses of covariance showed volumetric differences between DID and HC. Partial correlations exhibited relationships between the three factors of the dissociative experience scale scores (dissociative amnesia, absorption, depersonalisation/derealisation) and traumatisation measures with hippocampal global and subfield volumes.

Results: Hippocampal volumes were found to be smaller in DID as compared with HC in bilateral global hippocampus and bilateral CA1, right CA4, right GC-ML-DG, and left presubiculum. Dissociative amnesia was the only dissociative symptom that correlated uniquely and significantly with reduced bilateral hippocampal CA1 subfield volumes. Regarding traumatisation, only emotional neglect correlated negatively with bilateral global hippocampus, bilateral CA1, CA4 and GC-ML-DG, and right CA3.

Conclusion: We propose decreased CA1 volume as a biomarker for dissociative amnesia. We also propose that traumatisation, specifically emotional neglect, is interlinked with dissociative amnesia in having a detrimental effect on hippocampal volume.

Citations in the library