Skip to content

Cerebral Organoid Research Ethics and Pinning the Tail on the Donkey.

Alex McKeown

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics May 10, 2023 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180123000221 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Consciousness Suffering Research ethics Therapeutic benefits Organoid research
Key points Argues that organoid research ethics faces a dilemma: discovering how to distinguish conscious from non-conscious organoids risks creating suffering organoids, while avoiding such research leaves the risk of inadvertent suffering, especially when modeling brain disorders may require inducing stress. Proposes a tentative way forward to negotiate this challenge and maximize therapeutic benefits.

Abstract

The risk of creating cerebral organoids/assembloids conscious enough to suffer is a recurrent concern in organoid research ethics. On one hand, we should, apparently, avoid discovering how to distinguish between organoids that it would be permissible (non-conscious) and impermissible (conscious) to use in research, since if successful we would create organoids that suffer. On the other, if we do not, the risk persists that research might inadvertently continue to cause organoids to suffer. Moreover, since modeling some brain disorders may require inducing stress in organoids, it is unclear how to eliminate the risk, if we want to develop effective therapies. We are committed to harm avoidance but hamstrung by a presumption that we should avoid research that might tell us clearly when suffering occurs. How can we negotiate this challenge and maximize the therapeutic benefits of cerebral organoid research? The author interrogates the challenge, suggesting a tentative way forward.

Citations in the library