Skip to content

Phase 0, Including Microdosing Approaches: Applying the Three Rs and Increasing the Efficiency of Human Drug Development

Tal Burt, Le Thuy Vuong, Elizabeth Baker, Graeme C. Young, A. Daniel McCartt, Mats Bergström, Yuichi Sugiyama, Robert Combes

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals December 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1177/026119291804600603 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Microdosing
Key findings The authors argue that Phase 0 approaches, including microdosing, have advanced in applications, methodology, operations, and drug development culture. They contend these approaches enable safer, quicker, cheaper first-in-human testing, improve extrapolation from microdose to therapeutic exposures, and can reduce animal testing through early termination of development.

Abstract

Phase 0 approaches, including microdosing, involve the use of sub-therapeutic exposures to the tested drugs, thus enabling safer, more-relevant, quicker and cheaper first-in-human (FIH) testing. These approaches also have considerable potential to limit the use of animals in human drug development. Recent years have witnessed progress in applications, methodology, operations, and drug development culture. Advances in applications saw an expansion in therapeutic areas, developmental scenarios and scientific objectives, in, for example, protein drug development and paediatric drug development. In the operational area, the increased sensitivity of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), expansion of the utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging, and the introduction of Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS), have led to the increased accessibility and utility of Phase 0 approaches, while reducing costs and exposure to radioactivity. PET has extended the application of microdosing, from its use as a predominant tool to record pharmacokinetics, to a method for recording target expression and target engagement, as well as cellular and tissue responses. Advances in methodology include adaptive Phase 0/Phase 1 designs, cassette and cocktail microdosing, and Intra-Target Microdosing (ITM), as well as novel modelling opportunities and simulations. Importantly, these methodologies increase the predictive power of extrapolation from microdose to therapeutic level exposures. However, possibly the most challenging domain in which progress has been made, is the culture of drug development. One of the main potential values of Phase 0 approaches is the opportunity to terminate development early, thus not only applying the principle of ‘kill-early-kill-cheap’ to enhance the efficiency of drug development, but also obviating the need for the full package of animal testing required for therapeutic level Phase 1 studies. Finally, we list developmental scenarios that utilised Phase 0 approaches in novel drug development.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on microdosing, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics