What is a Pseudoscience of Consciousness? Lessons from Recent Adversarial Collaborations
September 17, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/28z3y (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary |
|---|---|
| Citations | 5 |
| Key points | Argues that the problems surrounding the adversarial collaboration on testing theories of consciousness (ARC-Cogitate) are institutional rather than merely scientific, and contends that these issues extend beyond consciousness science to open science, cognitive neuroscience, and neurobiology, potentially harming the broader scientific community if not addressed together. |
Abstract
Some colleagues have questioned about our recent joint statement (Fleming et al 2023), so I try to address them here, as well as to provide some background. I also discuss what I think really went wrong with the recent adversarial collaboration on testing theories of consciousness (ARC-Cogitate), which has in part led to the statement. In a previous open review I already discussed the scientific content of their recent preprint. Here I focus on the institutional context, from my own personal perspective, as someone familiar with both the project itself and several other related (ongoing) projects in the field. There are issues that concern more than the subfield of consciousness science alone; advocates of open science, cognitive neuroscience, and theories in neurobiology in general may also benefit from some awareness of these problems, as they may end up spreading to and reflecting badly on the broader scientific community - if we do not make an effort to address them together.
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2025
- Three dimensions of time: An approach for reconciling the discrepancies between experienced time and modern physics Possibility Studies & Society September 1, 2024
- Conscious Causality, Observer-Observed Simultaneity, and the Problem of Time for Integrated Information Theory. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) July 30, 2024
- Bonkerism: a NEW Science of Consciousness? PsyArXiv March 15, 2024
- Consciousness under the spotlight: the problem of measuring subjective experience PsyArXiv January 15, 2024
Cites 18
- Are we underestimating the richness of visual experience? Neuroscience of Consciousness 2017
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science Neuroscience of Consciousness 2022
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of the field of consciousness science June 14, 2021
- Where is the ‘posterior hot zone’? Open Review of Cogitate et al (2023): “An Adversarial Collaboration to Critically Evaluate Theories of Consciousness” August 18, 2023
- Communicating and conducting modern consciousness science July 7, 2023
and 13 more in the library