Skip to content

An Open-Label Study of Adjunctive Dextromethorphan/Quinidine in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Philip R Wang, Mani Yavi, Holim Lee, Yasmine Kotb, Lorie Shora, Lawrence T. Park, Carlos A. Zarate

Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology September 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001738 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Open-label pilot study Placebo-controlled Peer reviewed
Sample size 17
Population Inpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (40.8 ± 12.3 years; 9 females/8 males)
Intervention Dextromethorphan/quinidine
Dose 20 mg/10 mg up to 3 times daily
Duration 5.1 ± 2.7 weeks; no set endpoint, followed until DM/Q discontinuation or hospital discharge
Measures Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Topics Depression
Key points Adjunctive dextromethorphan/quinidine was associated with response in 47% of 17 inpatients with treatment-resistant depression (12% full, 35% partial), with a largest observed mean MADRS reduction of 6.4 points (21.0%). The authors report it was well tolerated and conclude that larger placebo-controlled trials are needed to establish real-world efficacy.

Abstract

Abstract:

Background: Approximately one third of individuals with major depressive disorder have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Glutamatergic modulators such as the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine have rapid and robust antidepressant effects, but their use has been limited by accessibility and route of administration. This open-label pilot study assessed the adjunctive antidepressant efficacy of dextromethorphan/quinidine (DM/Q) in TRD.

Methods: Inpatients with TRD (n = 17, 40.8 ± 12.3 years; 9 females/8 males) received adjunctive open-label DM/Q (20 mg/10 mg) up to 3 times daily. The study had no set endpoint; participants were followed until they discontinued DM/Q or were discharged. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores were obtained at baseline (before DM/Q administration) and regularly during hospitalization. Full response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in baseline MADRS score, partial response as a 25% to 50% decrease in baseline MADRS score, and nonresponse as a <25% reduction or an increase in baseline MADRS score.

Results: The 17 inpatients received open-label DM/Q for 5.1 ± 2.7 weeks. Forty-seven percent of participants responded to DM/Q—12% achieved a full response and 35% achieved a partial response. The largest MADRS difference observed at any time point was −6.4 ± 8.4 (−21.0% ± 29.9%), and the MADRS difference observed at time of DM/Q discontinuation or hospital discharge was −4.8 ± 8.4 (−15.9% ± 29.7%). Twenty-four percent of participants experienced a nonserious adverse event; none experienced a serious adverse event.

Conclusions: In this open-label pilot study, 47% of participants responded to adjunctive DM/Q, which was well tolerated. Larger placebo-controlled trials are needed to determine the real-world efficacy of DM/Q.

Comparable studies

Other non-randomized and open-label trials on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Patients with moderate-to-severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression 2016 Open-label feasibility trial n = 12
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Patients with severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression 2017 Open-label trial n = 20
Quality of Acute Psychedelic Experience Predicts Therapeutic Efficacy of Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients with treatment-resistant depression 2018 Clinical trial n = 20
Rapid Resolution of Suicidal Ideation After a Single Infusion of anN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Antagonist in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder Subjects with DSM-IV-diagnosed treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2010 Open-label trial n = 33
Antidepressant Effects of a Single Dose of Ayahuasca in Patients With Recurrent Depression Patients with recurrent depression 2015 Open-label trial n = 17

Citations in the library

Explore topics