Skip to content

Cannabis use and nonuse in patients with first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing neurocognitive functioning

Teresa Sánchez‐Gutiérrez, Belén Fernández‐Castilla, Sara Barbeito, Ana María González-Pinto, Juan Antonio Becerra‐García, Ana Calvo

European Psychiatry 2020 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.9 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 673
Population Patients with first-episode psychosis, comprising 304 cannabis users and 369 nonusers
Topics Cannabis
Citations 27
Key findings Across 14 independent samples and 78 effect sizes, cannabis users and nonusers with first-episode psychosis showed no significant differences in any neurocognitive domain. The authors report that variability in effect sizes was partly explained by frequency of cannabis use, first-generation antipsychotic prescription, and study country, and they suggest low cannabis doses may be deleterious in some patients.

Abstract

Background: The implications of cannabis use in the onset of early psychosis and the severity of psychotic symptoms have resulted in a proliferation of studies on this issue. However, few have examined the effects of cannabis use on the cognitive symptoms of psychosis (i.e., neurocognitive functioning) in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the neurocognitive functioning of cannabis users (CU) and nonusers (NU) with FEP.

Methods: Of the 110 studies identified through the systematic review of 6 databases, 7 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 14 independent samples and 78 effect sizes. The total sample included 304 CU with FEP and 369 NU with FEP. The moderator variables were age at first use, duration of use, percentage of males, and age.

Results: Effect sizes were not significantly different from zero in any neurocognitive domain when users and NU were compared. Part of the variability in effect sizes was explained by the inclusion of the following moderator variables: (1) frequency of cannabis use (β = 0.013, F = 7.56, p = 0.017); (2) first-generation antipsychotics (β = 0.019, F = 34.46, p ≤ 0.001); and (3) country where the study was carried out (β = 0.266, t = 2.06, p = 0.043).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that cannabis use is not generally associated with neurocognitive functioning in patients with FEP. However, it highlights the deleterious effect of low doses of cannabis in some patients. It also stresses the importance of the type of antipsychotic prescription and cannabis dose as moderator variables in the neurocognitive functioning of CU with FEP.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.

Explore topics