Cannabis use and nonuse in patients with first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing neurocognitive functioning
Teresa Sánchez‐Gutiérrez, Belén Fernández‐Castilla, Sara Barbeito, Ana María González-Pinto, Juan Antonio Becerra‐García, Ana Calvo
European Psychiatry 2020 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.9 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 673 |
| Population | Patients with first-episode psychosis, comprising 304 cannabis users and 369 nonusers |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Citations | 27 |
| Key findings | Across 14 independent samples and 78 effect sizes, cannabis users and nonusers with first-episode psychosis showed no significant differences in any neurocognitive domain. The authors report that variability in effect sizes was partly explained by frequency of cannabis use, first-generation antipsychotic prescription, and study country, and they suggest low cannabis doses may be deleterious in some patients. |
Abstract
Background: The implications of cannabis use in the onset of early psychosis and the severity of psychotic symptoms have resulted in a proliferation of studies on this issue. However, few have examined the effects of cannabis use on the cognitive symptoms of psychosis (i.e., neurocognitive functioning) in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the neurocognitive functioning of cannabis users (CU) and nonusers (NU) with FEP.
Methods: Of the 110 studies identified through the systematic review of 6 databases, 7 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 14 independent samples and 78 effect sizes. The total sample included 304 CU with FEP and 369 NU with FEP. The moderator variables were age at first use, duration of use, percentage of males, and age.
Results: Effect sizes were not significantly different from zero in any neurocognitive domain when users and NU were compared. Part of the variability in effect sizes was explained by the inclusion of the following moderator variables: (1) frequency of cannabis use (β = 0.013, F = 7.56, p = 0.017); (2) first-generation antipsychotics (β = 0.019, F = 34.46, p ≤ 0.001); and (3) country where the study was carried out (β = 0.266, t = 2.06, p = 0.043).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that cannabis use is not generally associated with neurocognitive functioning in patients with FEP. However, it highlights the deleterious effect of low doses of cannabis in some patients. It also stresses the importance of the type of antipsychotic prescription and cannabis dose as moderator variables in the neurocognitive functioning of CU with FEP.
Comparable studies
Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medicinal cannabis for psychiatric disorders: a clinically-focused systematic review | 2020 | Systematic review | |
| Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review of the literature Cannabis users and controls in neuroimaging studies | 2009 | Systematic review | |
| Human Laboratory Studies on Cannabinoids and Psychosis. Healthy human subjects and individuals with schizophrenia | 2016 | Systematic review | |
| Cannabis, a cause for anxiety? A critical appraisal of the anxiogenic and anxiolytic properties | 2020 | Systematic review | |
| Age-related differences in the impact of cannabis use on the brain and cognition: a systematic review | 2019 | Systematic review |