Risk-thresholds for the association between frequency of cannabis use and the development of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tessa Robinson, Muhammad Usman Ali, Bethany Easterbrook, Wayne Hall, Didier Jutras-Aswad, Benedikt Fischer
Psychological Medicine March 24, 2022 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722000502 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA meta-analysis of ten studies (three cohort, seven case-control) with 7,390 participants aged 12–65 found a log-linear dose-response association between cannabis use frequency and psychosis risk. The risk of psychosis significantly increased with weekly or more frequent use: weekly use showed a relative risk of 1.35 (95% CI 1.19–1.52) and daily use a relative risk of 1.76 (95% CI 1.47–2.12). Less frequent use (yearly or monthly) was not associated with a significant increase in risk. The authors conclude that frequent cannabis users are at increased risk of psychosis and recommend public health messages convey these risk thresholds.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 7,390 |
| Population | Participants aged 12–65 years from case-control and cohort studies |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Keywords | Relative risk Confidence interval Odds ratio Psychosis |
| Citations | 61 |
| Key finding | Weekly or more frequent cannabis use is associated with a significantly increased risk of psychosis, with no significant risk for less frequent use. |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies show a dose-response association between cannabis use and the risk of psychosis. This review aimed to determine whether there are identifiable risk-thresholds between the frequency of cannabis use and psychosis development. METHODS: Systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science for relevant studies (1 January 2010-26 April 2021). Case-control or cohort studies that investigated the relationship between cannabis use and the risk of psychosis development that reported effect estimates [odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), risk ratios (RR)] or the raw data to calculate them, with information on the frequency of cannabis consumption were included. Effect estimates were extracted from individual studies and converted to RR. Two-stage dose-response multivariable meta-analytic models were utilized and sensitivity analyses conducted. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. RESULTS: Ten original (three cohorts, seven case-control) studies were included, including 7390 participants with an age range of 12-65 years. Random-effect model meta-analyses showed a significant log-linear dose-response association between cannabis use frequency and psychosis development. A restricted cubic-splines model provided the best fit for the data, with the risk of psychosis significantly increasing for weekly or more frequent cannabis use [RR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.11 yearly; RR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.97-1.25 monthly; RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.19-1.52 weekly; RR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.47-2.12 daily]. CONCLUSION: Individuals using cannabis frequently are at increased risk of psychosis, with no significant risk associated with less frequent use. Public health prevention messages should convey these risk-thresholds, which should be refined through further work.