Near-death experiences and the importance of transparency in subjectivity, ontology and epistemology
T. K. Stripp
Brain Communications December 28, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab304 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Near-death experience |
| Key points | Argues that although Peinkhofer et al.'s hypothesis that near-death experiences are an evolutionary product of death feigning is novel and interesting, and their methodology is rigorous, the argumentation and evidence they present are less than compelling. |
Abstract
I read with great interest and diligence the paper from Peinkhofer et al. regarding how near-death experiences (NDEs) could be understood as the evolutionary product of death feigning (thanatosis). The authors provided this rather novel and interesting hypothesis regarding the evolutionary origin of NDEs, a topic that has most definitely received little attention in research.Could there be anadaptative or survival benefit biologically justifying the rich, subjective perceptions of the NDE? The authors of the paper provide a straightforward approach with a predefined methodology to test their hypothesis. But after this point, the argumentation and evidence brought forward by their quite rigorous approach, in my humble opinion, is less than compelling.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- Near‐death experiences: the experience of the self as real and not as an illusion Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences October 1, 2011
- A typology of near-death experiences American Journal of Psychiatry August 1, 1985
- The Near-Death Experience Content (NDE-C) scale: Development and psychometric validation Consciousness and Cognition November 1, 2020
- The evolutionary origin of near-death experiences: a systematic investigation Brain Communications June 22, 2021