Skip to content

The Idea of Mysticism in the Writings of Andrew Harvey and Pico Iyer

Shruti Mishra

SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH October 28, 2020 DOI: 10.24113/ijellh.v8i10.10795 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Key points Argues that Andrew Harvey's and Pico Iyer's travel writings on Buddhist regions differ in orientation: Harvey's work is more spiritual, while Iyer's is more technical and political. Both writers express a special bond with India, its people, culture, and cuisine.

Abstract

This paper deals with idea of mysticism represented in form of Buddhist Philosophy. I will be discussing the writings of Andrew Harvey and Pico Iyer. Both of them are commendable travel writers, they have extensively travelled and wrote about Buddhism. I will be comparing the writings of both and the way they looked at Buddhism and its philosophy for the welfare of people. A Journey in Ladakh by Andrew Harvey and Sun After Dark by Pico Iyer, both of them talk of about Buddhist dominant regions and its effect on people. The difference between the two is that, the writings of Andrew Harvey is more spiritual whereas Pico Iyer is more technical and political. Both of them express their special bond with India and its people. They talk about the peculiarities of people, the culture and cuisine.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics