Skip to content

EP1410 - ECE_1202 - Individualized endocrine care in non-binary individuals: efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of microdosing and selective hormone modulators

Ipsita Mishra

European Journal of Endocrinology August 10, 2026 DOI: 10.1093/ejendo/lvag096.1606 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective cohort study Peer reviewed
Sample size 180
Population Non-binary and gender-diverse adults receiving individualized gender-affirming hormone protocols; mean age 31.2 ± 6.8 years
Interventions Low-dose testosterone Raloxifene GnRH agonist
Dose Testosterone 25 mg/week; Estradiol 1 mg/day oral; Raloxifene 60 mg/day
Duration Median follow-up 3.5 years
Measures Gender Congruence Scale (GCS), Quality of Life (QoL) scores, Bone Mineral Density (BMD), lipid panels, HbA1c
Topics Microdosing
Key findings Individualized low-dose and selective hormone regimens were reported to improve Gender Congruence Scale and quality-of-life scores across all groups (P < .001) and to produce partial physical changes, with no major cardiovascular or thromboembolic events. Bone mineral density remained stable in the testosterone and raloxifene groups, but the low-dose estradiol group showed a small lumbar spine decrease (−0.015 g/cm2, P = .045) among those with estradiol below 100 pmol/L.

Abstract

Abstract Background Current gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) guidelines are optimized for binary outcomes (full masculinization or feminization), leaving a critical evidence gap for the growing population of non-binary and gender-diverse (NBGD) individuals who seek partial physical changes. These non-traditional therapeutic goals often necessitate the off-label use of low-dose, intermittent GAHT (“microdosing”), or Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and impact on long-term health markers in a cohort of NBGD individuals receiving individualized hormone protocols.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed data from 180 NBGD adults over a median follow-up period of 3.5 years .The cohort was stratified into three groups:Group A(Microdosing MHT;N = 95;Natal Sex—Female;Low dose testosterone;25 mg/week);Group B(Microdosing FHT;N = 65;Natal Sex—Male;Low dose Estradiol;1 mg/day [oral]);Group C(SERM Protocol;N = 20;Natal Sex—Male;SERM ± GnRH Agonist; Raloxifene 60 mg/day).Primary Outcome: Change in patient-reported psychosocial outcomes (Gender Congruence Scale (GCS) and Quality of Life (QoL) scores).Secondary

Outcomes: Physical changes, Bone Mineral Density (BMD), lipid panels, and HbA1c.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 31.2 ± 6.8 years.Baseline BMD T-scores were: Group A (LS T-score: −0.4 ± 0.9); Group B (LS T-score: −0.2 ± 1.0); Group C (LS T-score −0.5 ± 0.8). HbA1c and lipid profiles were comparable across groups and within the normal range.Both GCS and QoL scores demonstrated a statistically significant improvement across all groups from baseline to final follow-up (P < .001). Microdosing MHT(Group A) achieved initial voice deepening (75%) and facial hair growth (45%) in 88% of patients.Microdosing FHT (Group B) resulted in mild breast development (A-cup or small B-cup) in 70% of patients.The SERM Protocol (Group C) successfully achieved fat redistribution and skin softening with minimal/no palpable breast tissue in 95% of cases.Group A and C maintained stable BMD.Group B demonstrated a statistically significant, albeit small, decrease in Lumbar Spine BMD (−0.015 g/cm2, P = .045) in patients who maintained Estradiol levels below 100 pmol/L while achieving adequate Testosterone suppression.No major cardiovascular or thromboembolic events were recorded.

Conclusions: Microdosing and selective hormone modulator regimens represent a safe and effective strategy for achieving individualized, non-binary gender affirmation goals, resulting in significant improvements in GCS and QoL. While metabolic and cardiovascular profiles remained largely stable, the data highlights a risk of bone demineralization in a subset of Microdosing FHT patients, particularly those whose Estradiol levels are insufficient to provide skeletal protection.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on microdosing, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Microdosing psychedelics: personality, mental health, and creativity differences in microdosers Respondents recruited from online forums 2019 Observational study
Positive expectations predict improved mental-health outcomes linked to psychedelic microdosing Individuals planning a weekly microdosing regimen 2021 Prospective observational study n = 81
Might Microdosing Psychedelics Be Safe and Beneficial? An Initial Exploration. More than a thousand individuals from 59 countries 2019 Observational cohort n = 1,000
Psilocybin microdosers demonstrate greater observed improvements in mood and mental health at one month relative to non-microdosing controls Psilocybin microdosers and non-microdosing comparators 2022 Naturalistic observational study n = 1,133
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics of Oral Quinidine and Verapamil in Healthy Subjects: A Clinical Microdosing Study Healthy subjects 2011 Observational cohort

Explore topics