Skip to content

A Philosophy of Person and Identity

Robert D Henry

Verba Vitae March 28, 2025 DOI: 10.66100/vvj.v2i1.40 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Key findings Meijsing argues against Cartesian dualism, Locke's memory-based account of personhood, and reductive physicalist or materialist views, seeking a middle position on person and identity. The reviewer finds the critique effective but contends that it leaves underexplored theological issues concerning the eternal soul, the resurrected body, and the connection between ethics and metaphysics.

Abstract

Questions of personhood and identity have consistently intrigued the philosophical community, especially in our modern era. While the terminology has evolved, the core theme of what it means to be a person and how that identity persists amid transitory change is as ancient as the Greek dilemma of the Many and the One. Addressing this issue and establishing a stance on personhood and identity is Monica Meijsing's primary objective in her book, A Philosophy of Person and Identity: Where was I when I wasn’t there? Meijsing is dedicated to rejecting the extreme positions presented in Cartesian dualism, as well as the contemporary view often distorted by a misinterpretation of the scientific perspective on personhood in metaphysical physicalism and materialism. She dismantles the Cartesian concept of the disembodied self and the Lockean view of personhood as the unique identity of consciousness in memory. However, Meijsing’s ambitious and ultimately effective critique of classical and modern notions of self-identity and personhood may not fully engage with some theological implications of the soul as eternal, the incorruptible body transformed by Christ’s death and resurrection, and the interplay of ethics with metaphysics. This review will explore many commendable, articulate, and significant reflections on these themes in Meijsing’s work and examine their theological implications.