Minding Creation: response to critics
J. Leidenhag
Religious Studies January 3, 2024 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412523001038 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Leidenhag responds to four published replies to her book on theological panpsychism. She characterizes two responses as largely appreciative, proposing future engagement with theological anthropology, indigenous perspectives, process metaphysics, and the incarnation, and two as critical engagements with her arguments on panpsychism, naturalism, and theism. |
Abstract
Abstract In this article, I reply to four responses published in this journal to my book Minding Creation: Theological Panpsychism and the Doctrine of Creation. Two of these responses, by Christa L. McKirland and Eugene Fuimaono, and by Tim Miller and Thomas Jay Oord, are largely appreciative and propose future engagement with theological anthropology, indigenous perspectives, process metaphysics, and the doctrine of the incarnation. The other two responses, by Andrei Buckareff and Philip Goff, offer critical engagement on arguments I made regarding the relationship between panpsychism, naturalism, and theism.
Citations in the library
Cites 5
- Should panpsychists be Christians? Religious Studies July 3, 2023
- Should panpsychists be supernaturalists? Religious Studies September 1, 2024
- Engaging with Joanna Leidenhag's Minding Creation: Theological Panpsychism and the Doctrine of Creation Religious Studies March 15, 2023
- Can panpsychism solve thorny theological problems? Religious Studies February 27, 2023
- Panpsychism and God Philosophy Compass December 1, 2022