Panpsychism: A Response to the Anthropocene Age
Journal of Speculative Philosophy March 17, 2021 DOI: 10.5325/jspecphil.35.1.0027 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPanpsychism, the view that material elements of the universe have mental properties, has gained credibility in the Anthropocene because human influence blurs traditional boundaries between mind and matter. While some panpsychists erase all distinctions between living and nonliving, human and nonhuman, and evolved and made entities, this article uses Whitehead's process philosophy to defend panpsychism while developing criteria—causation, relationality, unity, and intentionality—to differentiate natural living forms, natural nonliving forms, and human artifacts.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Philosophy Environmental science |
| Key finding | Argues that panpsychism can be defended while using Whiteheadian criteria of causation, relationality, unity, and intentionality to differentiate natural living forms, natural nonliving forms, and human artifacts. |
Abstract
abstract:Panpsychism, the view that the material elements of the universe have mental properties, has until quite recently remained in the periphery of the philosophical mainstream due to its blatant contradiction of normative Cartesian dualities, which divided the world into mental properties (that inhere in human beings alone) and material properties, that are devoid of value and sentience. The recent geological shift to the Anthropocene Age, in which human culture can be found in pesticide resistant mosquitoes and the ozone heavens, has undermined the foundations of Cartesian dualism, making panpsychism a credible alternative. Yet some panpsychists go too far by conflating all distinctions between living and nonliving, human and nonhuman, evolved and made entities. Using Whitehead’s process philosophy, this article will defend panpsychism and develop the philosophical criteria of causation, relationality, unity and intentionality to differentiate between natural living forms, natural nonliving forms, and human artifacts.