A Comparative Exploration of Human Potential and Self-Transcendence in Iqbal and Nietzsche
Shadab Ali Khan, Faizan Munawwar
Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy October 3, 2024 DOI: 10.36348/jaep.2024.v08i10.001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Nietzsche's Superman and Iqbal's Perfect Man represent divergent ideals of human potential: Nietzsche's is built on power, autonomy, and rejection of conventional morality, while Iqbal's combines spiritual self-actualization, ethical integrity, and altruistic service. The authors contend that Iqbal's model, rooted in religion, love, and justice, offers a paradigm for harmonious collective growth that surpasses Nietzsche's individualistic ideal. |
Abstract
This study examines the essential conceptual distinctions between Nietzsche's notion of the Superman and Iqbal's conception of the Perfect Man, two divergent goals of human potential. Nietzsche's Superman, grounded on power, autonomy, and the repudiation of conventional morality, aspires to grandeur via individual supremacy and the transcendence of social norms. Conversely, Iqbal’s Perfect Man is a fusion of heavenly grandeur and beauty, attaining excellence via spiritual self-actualization, ethical integrity, and altruistic service to mankind. Nietzsche’s Superman dismisses metaphysical ideas and flourishes via human will, but Iqbal’s Perfect Man derives power from religion, love, and justice. This contrast highlights a profound philosophical divergence: Nietzsche’s perspective centers on existential power, while Iqbal’s prioritizes spiritual development and collective advancement. The thesis ultimately emphasizes Iqbal’s Perfect Man as a paradigm for harmonious human growth, surpassing Nietzsche’s individualistic ideal.