The Vanishing Paradox: How a Lucid Dream Solves Newcomb's Dilemma
Abel Sánchez Amor
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) December 30, 2025 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18098005 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Topics | Lucid dreaming |
| Key points | Proposes that Newcomb's Paradox, which seems to force a choice between two compelling but conflicting lines of reasoning, can be resolved by an original solution inspired by Eastern philosophy and lucid dreaming, reconciling freedom of choice with a possibly predetermined future. |
Abstract
Newcomb's Paradox is a fascinating puzzle that has baffled philosophers and decision theorists for over half a century. It presents a scenario in which logic seems to split into two opposing paths, each with compelling arguments in its favor. This essay will not only explain the problem simply but also reveal an original solution inspired by Eastern philosophy and the experience of lucid dreaming. The aim is to resolve the apparent contradiction between our freedom to choose and the possibility that the future is already predetermined.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on lucid dreaming, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Varieties of Lucid Dreaming Experience | 2000 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The Neurobiology of Consciousness: Lucid Dreaming Wakes Up | 2009 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams | 2013 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| New perspectives for the study of lucid dreaming: From brain stimulation to philosophical theories of self-consciousness | 2010 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Lucid dreaming: Evidence and methodology | 2000 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |